Skip to content
aiqbench takeMachine Learning

aiqbench analysis

This benchmark study evaluates the limits of RGB-only Simultaneous Localization and Mapping (SLAM) in low-light conditions, revealing that inertial fusion and global optimization are critical for maintaining stable tracking without relying on expensive LiDAR or thermal sensors. The analysis highlights a performance gap where current systems either diverge under poor illumination or accumulate significant absolute errors over time due to the lack of loop closure mechanisms. Advancing autonomous robotics in dark environments will likely depend on developing specialized learned front-ends rather than simply extending existing well-lit benchmarks.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

SLAM in Low-Light Environments: Project Report

arXiv3 min read

arXiv:2607.17699v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Simultaneous localization and mapping (SLAM) is one of the fundamental problems in robotics, as it enables autonomous operations in real-world scenarios. Under low illumination, reduced contrast, sensor noise, and motion blur degrade both feature extraction and feature matching, while compensating with LiDAR, depth, or thermal sensors raises cost, power draw, and integration complexity. Existing benchmarks remain dominated by well-lit indoor or daylight sequences, leaving open how far SLAM with standard RGB cameras can be pushed in the dark. We benchmark six systems spanning the feature-based, direct, filter-based, and learning-based paradigms - ORB-SLAM3, DSO, Kimera-VIO, OpenVINS, DPVO, and DPV-SLAM - on five LaMARia sequences of varying difficulty and illumination, reporting absolute and relative pose error alongside control-point recall. Kimera-VIO is the only system to track all five sequences to completion, combining the lowest relative pose error with steadily growing absolute error due to the absence of loop closure; DPVO and DPV-SLAM never lose tracking but incur absolute errors of roughly 100 m under low light; and the classical monocular pipelines (ORB-SLAM3, DSO) together with the filter-based OpenVINS fail outright or diverge on most of the harder and low-light sequences. The results suggest that RGB-only SLAM maintains stable low-light tracking only when both inertial fusion and global optimization are present. Closing the remaining gap will likely require low-light-specific learned front-ends or a return to complementary sensing.

Abstract:Simultaneous localization and mapping (SLAM) is one of the fundamental problems in robotics, as it enables autonomous operations in real-world scenarios. Under low illumination, reduced contrast, sensor noise, and motion blur degrade both feature extraction and feature matching, while compensating with LiDAR, depth, or thermal sensors raises cost, power draw, and integration complexity. Existing benchmarks remain dominated by well-lit indoor or daylight sequences, leaving open how far SLAM with standard RGB cameras can be pushed in the dark. We benchmark six systems spanning the feature-based, direct, filter-based, and learning-based paradigms - ORB-SLAM3, DSO, Kimera-VIO, OpenVINS, DPVO, and DPV-SLAM - on five LaMARia sequences of varying difficulty and illumination, reporting absolute and relative pose error alongside control-point recall. Kimera-VIO is the only system to track all five sequences to completion, combining the lowest relative pose error with steadily growing absolute error due to the absence of loop closure; DPVO and DPV-SLAM never lose tracking but incur absolute errors of roughly 100 m under low light; and the classical monocular pipelines (ORB-SLAM3, DSO) together with the filter-based OpenVINS fail outright or diverge on most of the harder and low-light sequences. The results suggest that RGB-only SLAM maintains stable low-light tracking only when both inertial fusion and global optimization are present. Closing the remaining gap will likely require low-light-specific learned front-ends or a return to complementary sensing.

Robotics (cs.RO); Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV)

arXiv:2607.17699 [cs.RO]

(or arXiv:2607.17699v1 [cs.RO] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.17699 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 247 words

Related coverage