aiqbench analysis
PrePO addresses the computational inefficiency of reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards by predicting optimization trajectories to skip redundant backward passes. This method maintains convergence guarantees while reducing wall-clock time, offering a practical scaling solution for training large language models without increasing active costs.
Skip What You Can Predict: Predictive Repositioning for Policy Optimization for Efficient LLM Training
arXiv:2605.06755v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) can improve the reasoning ability of large language models, but repeatedly updating a policy on the same rollout batch is expensive: every additional update requires another backward pass, and multi-step methods pay for all intermediate optimization steps. We introduce Predictive Repositioning for Policy Optimization (PrePO), which uses two observed optimizer transitions to estimate a farther point along the same-batch optimization trajectory, moves partway toward that point, evaluates the original objective there, and applies a corrective update. This gives PrePO a fixed active cost that does not grow with the virtual optimization depth. Our analysis gives finite-horizon error bounds for AdamW and Muon and shows that sufficiently accurate endpoint estimates preserve the usual descent and convergence behavior of smooth gradient descent. In RLVR experiments, PrePO reaches matched performance targets in fewer optimization steps and lower wall-clock time than the corresponding baselines. We further evaluate the same update mechanism in supervised fine-tuning on a different dataset, showing that its use is not restricted to the original RLVR setting. Together, these results suggest that PrePO provides a practical mechanism for approximating repeated same-batch optimization while avoiding the cost of explicitly executing every intermediate update.
Abstract:Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) can improve the reasoning ability of large language models, but repeatedly updating a policy on the same rollout batch is expensive: every additional update requires another backward pass, and multi-step methods pay for all intermediate optimization steps. We introduce Predictive Repositioning for Policy Optimization (PrePO), which uses two observed optimizer transitions to estimate a farther point along the same-batch optimization trajectory, moves partway toward that point, evaluates the original objective there, and applies a corrective update. This gives PrePO a fixed active cost that does not grow with the virtual optimization depth. Our analysis gives finite-horizon error bounds for AdamW and Muon and shows that sufficiently accurate endpoint estimates preserve the usual descent and convergence behavior of smooth gradient descent. In RLVR experiments, PrePO reaches matched performance targets in fewer optimization steps and lower wall-clock time than the corresponding baselines. We further evaluate the same update mechanism in supervised fine-tuning on a different dataset, showing that its use is not restricted to the original RLVR setting. Together, these results suggest that PrePO provides a practical mechanism for approximating repeated same-batch optimization while avoiding the cost of explicitly executing every intermediate update.
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2605.06755 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2605.06755v2 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.06755 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 292 words
Related coverage

The Entangled Dimensions of Decision Theory
LessWrong · Jul 30, 2026

Build a Physical AI model factory with NVIDIA Cosmos 3 on SageMaker HyperPod
AWS · Sep 4, 2026
[AINews] Reflection Beam - 501B-A23B American Open Model
Latent Space · Oct 6, 2026

Expenditure Horizon: Measuring Optimization Ability, with an Application to NanoGPT
METR · Jul 21, 2026