Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Research

aiqbench analysis

SkillLift addresses the high computational cost of evolving skills in LLM-based agents by replacing expensive full agent rollouts with a cheaper, learned rubric for ranking improvements. This bilevel optimization approach significantly reduces token usage while maintaining performance on complex task benchmarks, offering a practical path toward more efficient autonomous agent development.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

SkillLift: Learning Dense Rubrics from Sparse Oracles for Efficient Skill Evolution

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2609.15396v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: LLM-based agents increasingly rely on persistent skills, i.e., reusable procedural prompts, to adapt without weight updates. Existing skill self-evolution methods directly revise skill text based on execution feedback, but each oracle evaluation requires a full agent rollout, creating a supervision bottleneck that confines search to failure-patching updates. Our key insight is that ranking is a smoother supervision target than absolute outcome regression: identifying which skill is better requires fewer oracle evaluations than predicting exact scores. Building on this insight, we propose SkillLift, which decouples skill search from oracle cost by learning an oracle-aligned rubric as a structured evaluation space. We formalize this as a bilevel optimization problem solved via alternating optimization: an inner loop uses the frozen rubric as a cheap surrogate to guide skill revision at no oracle cost, while an outer loop invokes a small number of oracle rollouts to re-align the rubric via rank correlation, amortizing oracle cost and stabilizing text-space updates. Experiments on complex agent task benchmarks show that our method outperforms existing auto-skill methods with 40--70\% less token cost compared to frontier evolving methods. Codes are available at https://github.com/WalteR-MittY-pro/SkillLift.

Abstract:LLM-based agents increasingly rely on persistent skills, i.e., reusable procedural prompts, to adapt without weight updates. Existing skill self-evolution methods directly revise skill text based on execution feedback, but each oracle evaluation requires a full agent rollout, creating a supervision bottleneck that confines search to failure-patching updates. Our key insight is that ranking is a smoother supervision target than absolute outcome regression: identifying which skill is better requires fewer oracle evaluations than predicting exact scores. Building on this insight, we propose SkillLift, which decouples skill search from oracle cost by learning an oracle-aligned rubric as a structured evaluation space. We formalize this as a bilevel optimization problem solved via alternating optimization: an inner loop uses the frozen rubric as a cheap surrogate to guide skill revision at no oracle cost, while an outer loop invokes a small number of oracle rollouts to re-align the rubric via rank correlation, amortizing oracle cost and stabilizing text-space updates. Experiments on complex agent task benchmarks show that our method outperforms existing auto-skill methods with 40--70\% less token cost compared to frontier evolving methods. Codes are available at this https URL.

Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

arXiv:2609.15396 [cs.AI]

(or arXiv:2609.15396v1 [cs.AI] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.15396 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 280 words

Related coverage