aiqbench analysis
This paper establishes the first theoretical scaling laws for sketched linear contrastive learning by decomposing risk into irreducible error, approximation bias, and optimization variance. It reveals that learning interactions between paired views fundamentally alters how performance scales with model size, data volume, and training time compared to standard regression tasks. These findings offer a rigorous framework for optimizing compute efficiency in representation learning architectures where only partial observations are available.
Sketched Linear Contrastive Learning: Approximation, Optimization, and Statistical Scaling
arXiv:2606.26617v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Scaling laws describe how learning performance varies with model size, data size, and compute. While recent theoretical work has established scaling laws for sketched linear regression, much less is understood for contrastive representation learning. In this paper, we study a sketched linear model for contrastive learning under a paired Gaussian latent-variable setup. The learner observes only sketched views of two correlated variables and trains a bilinear contrastive score by full-batch empirical gradient descent. We analyze a Gaussian-negative quadratic contrastive surrogate under aligned power-law spectra and a contrastive source condition, where we derive a risk decomposition into irreducible risk, approximation error, GD bias, GD variance, and a cross term. The cross term is controlled by the bias and variance and therefore does not affect the upper-bound scaling. Our main theorem gives an explicit scaling law with respect to sketch dimension $M$, sample size $N$, and effective optimization horizon $L_{\mathrm{eff}}\gamma$. Compared with standard linear-regression scaling laws, the contrastive setting must learn interactions between two views, and this changes how optimization and finite-sample noise scale with model size, data, and training time. This provides a first theoretical step toward understanding scaling behavior in contrastive learning and gives guidance for balancing model size, data, and optimization compute.
Abstract:Scaling laws describe how learning performance varies with model size, data size, and compute. While recent theoretical work has established scaling laws for sketched linear regression, much less is understood for contrastive representation learning. In this paper, we study a sketched linear model for contrastive learning under a paired Gaussian latent-variable setup. The learner observes only sketched views of two correlated variables and trains a bilinear contrastive score by full-batch empirical gradient descent. We analyze a Gaussian-negative quadratic contrastive surrogate under aligned power-law spectra and a contrastive source condition, where we derive a risk decomposition into irreducible risk, approximation error, GD bias, GD variance, and a cross term. The cross term is controlled by the bias and variance and therefore does not affect the upper-bound scaling. Our main theorem gives an explicit scaling law with respect to sketch dimension $M$, sample size $N$, and effective optimization horizon $L_{\mathrm{eff}}\gamma$. Compared with standard linear-regression scaling laws, the contrastive setting must learn interactions between two views, and this changes how optimization and finite-sample noise scale with model size, data, and training time. This provides a first theoretical step toward understanding scaling behavior in contrastive learning and gives guidance for balancing model size, data, and optimization compute.
Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2606.26617 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2606.26617v2 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.26617 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 295 words
Related coverage

PIRAMID: Progress and Plans
LessWrong · Jul 27, 2026

Exploding variance of means of exponentials: least-squares to the rescue – Machine Learning Research Blog
francisbach.com · Sep 27, 2026
Linear RNN Scaling Laws: When Longer Sequences Beat More Sequences
arXiv · Sep 24, 2026
Scaling Laws for Dynamic Mini-Batch SGD in Sketched Linear Regression
arXiv · Aug 19, 2026