aiqbench analysis
This research introduces FullRespondent-LLM, a method that leverages large language models to generate coherent, multi-question survey responses rather than simulating isolated items. By jointly modeling item dependencies and marginal distributions, the approach significantly improves the realism of simulated populations for applications like market research and pricing optimization. The technique demonstrates superior generalization to unseen datasets while maintaining high accuracy on individual questions.
Simulating Respondents, Not Single Questions: Coherent Survey Generation with Large Language Models
arXiv:2609.34828v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models are increasingly used to simulate response distributions in social surveys. Prior work has achieved accurate population-level simulation for individual questions. Real questionnaires, however, ask each respondent a sequence of related questions. A simulated respondent should show coherent preferences across the whole questionnaire, not merely accurate distributions for isolated items. Existing single-item methods cannot accurately reproduce how the same person answers a complete survey. We propose FullRespondent-LLM (FR-LLM), which fine-tunes two specialized LLMs: a marginal model for each item's response distribution and a respondent-level autoregressive model for dependencies across answers. Marginal-Constrained Joint Projection (MCJP) then projects the autoregressive joint distribution onto the set satisfying the item-level marginals learned by the first model. This yields complete questionnaires with realistic cross-item relationships while retaining strong item-level accuracy. On two real-world social survey datasets, FR-LLM more accurately reproduces multi-question response patterns, maintains competitive single-item accuracy, and generalizes better to unseen populations and questions. In a small commercial-survey dataset, we use simulated responses to make pricing and stocking decisions; FR-LLM achieves the highest realized profit.
Abstract:Large language models are increasingly used to simulate response distributions in social surveys. Prior work has achieved accurate population-level simulation for individual questions. Real questionnaires, however, ask each respondent a sequence of related questions. A simulated respondent should show coherent preferences across the whole questionnaire, not merely accurate distributions for isolated items. Existing single-item methods cannot accurately reproduce how the same person answers a complete survey. We propose FullRespondent-LLM (FR-LLM), which fine-tunes two specialized LLMs: a marginal model for each item's response distribution and a respondent-level autoregressive model for dependencies across answers. Marginal-Constrained Joint Projection (MCJP) then projects the autoregressive joint distribution onto the set satisfying the item-level marginals learned by the first model. This yields complete questionnaires with realistic cross-item relationships while retaining strong item-level accuracy. On two real-world social survey datasets, FR-LLM more accurately reproduces multi-question response patterns, maintains competitive single-item accuracy, and generalizes better to unseen populations and questions. In a small commercial-survey dataset, we use simulated responses to make pricing and stocking decisions; FR-LLM achieves the highest realized profit.
Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2609.34828 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2609.34828v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.34828 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 267 words
Related coverage
The J-Space Debate, Agent Swarms, and Pacing Frontier AI - Digital Minds Newsletter #4
LessWrong · Sep 18, 2026

The Entangled Dimensions of Decision Theory
LessWrong · Jul 30, 2026

Digital States 2026: AI Moves From Experiment to Infrastructure
govtech.com · Sep 24, 2026

[AINews] not much happened today
Latent Space · Sep 18, 2026