Signal Simplification Is Not Predictive Simplification: Diagnosing Residual Neural Forecasting in Short-Horizon Volatility

arXiv:2610.03019v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Hybrid statistical-neural pipelines often assume that a successful statistical first stage leaves a cleaner and more learnable residual target. We examine that assumption in short-horizon volatility forecasting through a signal-forecast-system diagnostic framework. Across five liquid U.S. assets, a volatility-aligned HAR-style model outperforms AR, MA, and ARIMA. Within expanding training windows, the pre-standardization fitted residual process used to construct residual-LSTM sequences has about 82% lower variance than the corresponding target and near-zero lag-1 autocorrelation; independently, rolling pseudo-out-of-sample HAR errors show about 74% variance reduction and similarly weak lag-1 dependence. Residual-only LSTM augmentation nevertheless raises mean squared error from 0.3049 to 0.3594 on average, with deterioration on every asset. Pure LSTM records the lowest selected pseudo-out-of-sample MSE, 0.2649, while the residual hybrid requires substantially more end-to-end runtime without improving accuracy. We describe this pattern as forecaster-preconditioner asymmetry: first-stage forecasting success and statistical residual simplification need not translate into useful downstream neural preconditioning.

Abstract:Hybrid statistical-neural pipelines often assume that a successful statistical first stage leaves a cleaner and more learnable residual target. We examine that assumption in short-horizon volatility forecasting through a signal-forecast-system diagnostic framework. Across five liquid U.S. assets, a volatility-aligned HAR-style model outperforms AR, MA, and ARIMA. Within expanding training windows, the pre-standardization fitted residual process used to construct residual-LSTM sequences has about 82% lower variance than the corresponding target and near-zero lag-1 autocorrelation; independently, rolling pseudo-out-of-sample HAR errors show about 74% variance reduction and similarly weak lag-1 dependence. Residual-only LSTM augmentation nevertheless raises mean squared error from 0.3049 to 0.3594 on average, with deterioration on every asset. Pure LSTM records the lowest selected pseudo-out-of-sample MSE, 0.2649, while the residual hybrid requires substantially more end-to-end runtime without improving accuracy. We describe this pattern as forecaster-preconditioner asymmetry: first-stage forecasting success and statistical residual simplification need not translate into useful downstream neural preconditioning.

Accepted at the 10th Computational Methods in Systems and Software (CoMeSySo 2026). 17 pages, 4 figures

Machine Learning (cs.LG)

arXiv:2610.03019 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2610.03019v1 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.03019 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

aiqbench analysis

Signal Simplification Is Not Predictive Simplification: Diagnosing Residual Neural Forecasting in Short-Horizon Volatility

Related coverage