aiqbench analysis
This study reveals that voice input introduces significantly more robustness challenges for LLMs than typing due to structural noise in transcription rather than simple fillers. The research indicates that increasing reasoning capacity can recover accuracy from typed inputs but fails to mitigate the inherent degradation caused by spoken language processing pipelines. These findings are critical for developers building reliable agent interfaces, highlighting a fundamental asymmetry between keyboard and voice interaction channels.
Should We Type or Talk to LLM Agents? A Comprehensive Study of Voice and Keyboard Input Perturbations
arXiv:2608.03970v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Human input reaches language models by typing or speaking, and each channel leaves a distinct signature: orthographic noise for keyboards; for voice, disfluency from conventional transcription and restructuring from AI-backed dictation tools. How do they impact an LLM's performance? In this paper we present HIVE (Human Input-Variation Engine), a suite of voice transcription perturbations and QWERTY keyboard perturbations. We use HIVE to evaluate how robust models are to these perturbations. We present seven findings. (i) Voice transcription perturbations lower accuracy across every instruction-tuned model we test, and it is the structure of the transcription rather than its fillers that carries the cost. (ii) QWERTY keyboard perturbations cost less, and a model absorbs a lot of them before accuracy falls away. (iii) Both trace back to one cause, how many of the question's tokens survive the perturbation: destroying a token is what hurts, while adding new ones alongside it costs little. (iv) The gap between the two channels appears only where the answer must be constructed or deduced; on multiple choice there is none. (v) The harm does not solely come from test-set contamination. (vi) It cannot be trained away with lightweight adaptation. (vii) A thinking budget recovers the keyboard channel almost entirely but leaves the spoken registers untouched, and compressed speech is worse with it.
Title:Should We Type or Talk to LLM Agents? A Comprehensive Study of Voice and Keyboard Input Perturbations
Abstract:Human input reaches language models by typing or speaking, and each channel leaves a distinct signature: orthographic noise for keyboards; for voice, disfluency from conventional transcription and restructuring from AI-backed dictation tools. How do they impact an LLM's performance? In this paper we present HIVE (Human Input-Variation Engine), a suite of voice transcription perturbations and QWERTY keyboard perturbations. We use HIVE to evaluate how robust models are to these perturbations. We present seven findings. (i) Voice transcription perturbations lower accuracy across every instruction-tuned model we test, and it is the structure of the transcription rather than its fillers that carries the cost. (ii) QWERTY keyboard perturbations cost less, and a model absorbs a lot of them before accuracy falls away. (iii) Both trace back to one cause, how many of the question's tokens survive the perturbation: destroying a token is what hurts, while adding new ones alongside it costs little. (iv) The gap between the two channels appears only where the answer must be constructed or deduced; on multiple choice there is none. (v) The harm does not solely come from test-set contamination. (vi) It cannot be trained away with lightweight adaptation. (vii) A thinking budget recovers the keyboard channel almost entirely but leaves the spoken registers untouched, and compressed speech is worse with it.
Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2608.03970 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2608.03970v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.03970 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 326 words
Related coverage

Six Principles of Voice Design: Designing for the Ear and Encoding It into Agent Script
Salesforce Blog · Oct 8, 2026
Biological Superintelligence
LessWrong · Jul 30, 2026

Underwriting Superintelligence: Backing Agents you can Sue — Rune Kvist, AIUC
Latent Space · Sep 16, 2026

Concrete Evaluations to Investigate the OpenAI Model That Hacked Hugging Face
AI Alignment Forum · Aug 3, 2026