Shortcuts in the Tail: Debiasing via Post-Hoc Spectral Compression of Fine-Tuning Updates

arXiv:2606.07596v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Fine-tuning often introduces spurious correlations alongside task knowledge, causing systematic failures on underrepresented groups. Existing mitigations require retraining, group labels, or curated counterfactual data. We show a simple post-hoc intervention reduces shortcut reliance without any of these: truncating the tail of the SVD of $\Delta W = W_\mathrm{ft} - W_\mathrm{base}$ reduces the spurious-group gap while preserving task accuracy. Across three instruction-tuned models ($0.5$B--$7$B) and four classification benchmarks, top-$k$ truncation reduces the gap on every cell at $<2$ pp accuracy loss, by up to $5\times$ on CivilComments. We propose this works because the shortcut response sits in the tail of the singular ordering of $\Delta W$, a claim about how truncation behaves rather than about the raw singular values, which are broadly distributed and look the same across all four datasets. A controlled boundary case in which fine-tuning has only a shortcut to learn shows the predicted FT-to-base collapse, and bottom-/random-$k$ and matched-rank LoRA controls rule out generic low-rank approximation and rank-constrained training as the explanation. We read this as preliminary evidence that the singular basis of $\Delta W$ is a useful coordinate system for studying what fine-tuning has learned.

Abstract:Fine-tuning often introduces spurious correlations alongside task knowledge, causing systematic failures on underrepresented groups. Existing mitigations require retraining, group labels, or curated counterfactual data. We show a simple post-hoc intervention reduces shortcut reliance without any of these: truncating the tail of the SVD of $\Delta W = W_\mathrm{ft} - W_\mathrm{base}$ reduces the spurious-group gap while preserving task accuracy. Across three instruction-tuned models ($0.5$B--$7$B) and four classification benchmarks, top-$k$ truncation reduces the gap on every cell at $<2$ pp accuracy loss, by up to $5\times$ on CivilComments. We propose this works because the shortcut response sits in the tail of the singular ordering of $\Delta W$, a claim about how truncation behaves rather than about the raw singular values, which are broadly distributed and look the same across all four datasets. A controlled boundary case in which fine-tuning has only a shortcut to learn shows the predicted FT-to-base collapse, and bottom-/random-$k$ and matched-rank LoRA controls rule out generic low-rank approximation and rank-constrained training as the explanation. We read this as preliminary evidence that the singular basis of $\Delta W$ is a useful coordinate system for studying what fine-tuning has learned.

Machine Learning (cs.LG)

arXiv:2606.07596 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2606.07596v1 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.07596 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

aiqbench analysis

Shortcuts in the Tail: Debiasing via Post-Hoc Spectral Compression of Fine-Tuning Updates

Related coverage