aiqbench analysis
This research advances memory management in reinforcement learning by explicitly modeling the transfer of symbolic observations from short-term buffers to long-term knowledge graphs. The proposed neuro-symbolic approach outperforms standard neural and symbolic baselines on the RoomKG benchmark, demonstrating that lightweight local policies can effectively prioritize navigation- and query-relevant facts under partial observability.
Short-Term-to-Long-Term Memory Transfer for Knowledge Graphs under Partial Observability
arXiv:2605.22142v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Reinforcement learning under partial observability requires deciding what information to retain, yet most memory-based approaches do not explicitly model short-term-to-long-term transfer of symbolic observations. We study this transfer process in a temporal knowledge-graph memory setting and cast it as a neuro-symbolic value-based decision problem: for each observed triple, the agent chooses whether to keep or drop it before long-term insertion. To handle variable-sized short-term buffers, we use a per-item Q-learning design with shared parameters and a practical temporal-difference update over matched items across consecutive steps. On the RoomKG benchmark at long-term memory capacity 128, learned transfer decisions outperform symbolic and neural baselines, including symbolic baselines with temporal annotations and history-based LSTM/Transformer baselines. Across transfer-policy ablations, a lightweight local short-term-only variant performs best, and step-level behavior shows that the policy keeps navigation- and query-relevant facts while discarding lower-value candidate facts, supporting explicit and interpretable memory decisions under memory constraints.
Abstract:Reinforcement learning under partial observability requires deciding what information to retain, yet most memory-based approaches do not explicitly model short-term-to-long-term transfer of symbolic observations. We study this transfer process in a temporal knowledge-graph memory setting and cast it as a neuro-symbolic value-based decision problem: for each observed triple, the agent chooses whether to keep or drop it before long-term insertion. To handle variable-sized short-term buffers, we use a per-item Q-learning design with shared parameters and a practical temporal-difference update over matched items across consecutive steps. On the RoomKG benchmark at long-term memory capacity 128, learned transfer decisions outperform symbolic and neural baselines, including symbolic baselines with temporal annotations and history-based LSTM/Transformer baselines. Across transfer-policy ablations, a lightweight local short-term-only variant performs best, and step-level behavior shows that the policy keeps navigation- and query-relevant facts while discarding lower-value candidate facts, supporting explicit and interpretable memory decisions under memory constraints.
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2605.22142 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2605.22142v3 [cs.LG] for this version)
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 162 words
Related coverage
Performance Profiling on AMD GPUs – Part 5: Profiling-Driven Kernel Optimization with an AI Code-Assist Tool
AMD · Jul 16, 2026

What is contextual retrieval? How AI agents find the right context
Neo4j · Sep 30, 2026

Wherever you’re building agents, Neo4j is already there
Neo4j · Oct 6, 2026

What are decision traces in a context graph? How they reveal agentic reasoning
Neo4j · Sep 8, 2026