aiqbench analysis
This paper establishes tight, dimension-free lower bounds for finding stationary points in smooth nonconvex optimization under higher-order smoothness assumptions, resolving an open theoretical gap. By proving that the previously known upper bounds are indeed optimal, the work clarifies the fundamental limits of first-order oracle complexity when leveraging Hessian or third-derivative information. Notably, the construction of these hard instances was assisted by a large language model, highlighting the evolving role of AI in advancing optimization theory itself.
Sharp First-Order Lower Bounds for Higher-Order Smooth Nonconvex Optimization
arXiv:2606.05438v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: We study the deterministic first-order oracle complexity of finding \(\epsilon\)-stationary points in smooth nonconvex optimization when the objective satisfies higher-order smoothness assumptions. While the classical \(\epsilon^{-2}\) rate is optimal under only Lipschitz gradients, higher-order smoothness leads to accelerated first-order upper bounds, most notably the \(\epsilon^{-7/4}\) rate under Lipschitz Hessians and the \(\epsilon^{-5/3}\) rate under Lipschitz third derivatives. The matching lower bounds, however, have remained open. We resolve this gap by proving a new dimension-free first-order lower bound for higher-order smooth nonconvex functions, valid for every finite smoothness order. In particular, our construction gives a matching \(\Omega(\epsilon^{-7/4})\) lower bound in the Hessian-Lipschitz case and a matching \(\Omega(\epsilon^{-5/3})\) lower bound in the third-order-smooth regime. The hard instance is based on a \emph{block-chain} mechanism that enforces blockwise oracle revelation while preserving the smoothness structure needed for the scalar hard instance. The lower-bound construction was discovered with the assistance of ChatGPT 5.5 Pro and subsequently verified by the authors.
Abstract:We study the deterministic first-order oracle complexity of finding \(\epsilon\)-stationary points in smooth nonconvex optimization when the objective satisfies higher-order smoothness assumptions. While the classical \(\epsilon^{-2}\) rate is optimal under only Lipschitz gradients, higher-order smoothness leads to accelerated first-order upper bounds, most notably the \(\epsilon^{-7/4}\) rate under Lipschitz Hessians and the \(\epsilon^{-5/3}\) rate under Lipschitz third derivatives. The matching lower bounds, however, have remained open. We resolve this gap by proving a new dimension-free first-order lower bound for higher-order smooth nonconvex functions, valid for every finite smoothness order. In particular, our construction gives a matching \(\Omega(\epsilon^{-7/4})\) lower bound in the Hessian-Lipschitz case and a matching \(\Omega(\epsilon^{-5/3})\) lower bound in the third-order-smooth regime. The hard instance is based on a \emph{block-chain} mechanism that enforces blockwise oracle revelation while preserving the smoothness structure needed for the scalar hard instance. The lower-bound construction was discovered with the assistance of ChatGPT 5.5 Pro and subsequently verified by the authors.
24 pages, 1 table. Version 2 adds explicit numerical constants to all theorems
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Optimization and Control (math.OC)
arXiv:2606.05438 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2606.05438v2 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.05438 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 264 words
Related coverage

Stock Market Today Highlights, Sept 2: Sensex ends 373 pts lower at 76, 570, Nifty below 24, 000; Asian Paints, HDFC Bank fall most
thehindubusinessline.com · Sep 2, 2026

GEM Training: How Meta Doubled the Efficiency of Its LLM-Scale Ads Foundation Model
Meta Engineering · Aug 3, 2026

Why do models task game?
AI Alignment Forum · Aug 6, 2026
Dyna-2: General Purpose Physical Agents with Hour-Long Autonomy — Jason Ma, Dyna Robotics
Latent Space · Oct 13, 2026