Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Research

aiqbench analysis

Composing insight from the full article — this may take a moment.

Sources coveringarXiv, Latent Space, LessWrong, Roboflow Blog

Shared relations, specific choices: conditional sensitivity and competing pathways in language models

arXiv1 min read

arXiv:2611.01809v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: How does a relational representation shared across queries drive a query-specific choice? Controlled entity-binding experiments with GPT-2 Small, Qwen2.5-1.5B and Llama-3.2-1B reveal a low-dimensional relational background that is predominantly shared across query roles and transfers to new names. Same-domain interactions persist when another attribute domain is queried. After removing this component, restoring independently trained relation directions brings output contrasts closer to their original values than sign-reversed or equal-norm random controls in all three models. Yet a transferable relational representation need not have a transferable functional sign. In Qwen2.5, fixing model weights, the training-mean relation vector and edit dose yields opposite selection effects across binary and lexical-mapping prompts with different answer vocabularies. A factorial contrast of downstream sensitivities across attribute-query combinations determines the shared direction's local signed selection gain. In a separate eight-condition protocol, mean local gain is positive in Qwen2.5 and negative in Llama3.2. Late-component clamps resolve opposing pathway contributions: in Llama3.2, negative transmission through selected attention-only paths is partially offset by positive transmission through paths traversing both selected attention and MLP sets. Source-coordinate analyses establish distributed factor coverage, hidden-receiver readouts reveal layout-dependent combination, and instance-geometry interventions separate response direction from amplitude. These findings show how conditional sensitivity and competing pathways give shared relational structure its effect on specific choices.

Read the full article at arXiv

Related coverage