Skip to content
aiqbench takeMachine Learning

aiqbench analysis

This research introduces Shared Execution-Clock Drifting (SECD), a novel policy framework that explicitly models execution rhythm to enhance robotic manipulation under strict time constraints. By jointly predicting action curves and a shared monotone clock, the method improves success rates in dynamic tasks like intercepting moving objects on conveyors without increasing inference cost. The results demonstrate significant performance gains over existing one-step baselines when deployed on real robots using NVIDIA Thor hardware.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Shared Execution-Clock Drifting Policy for Dynamic Precision Manipulation

arXiv3 min read

arXiv:2609.23305v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Manipulation under time constraints requires both accurate actions and an execution rhythm that matches the evolving scene. This becomes critical when a robot must intercept moving objects or complete a sequence of adjustments before a deadline. Although one-step policies reduce generation cost, their directly predicted action sequences leave temporal allocation implicit. We propose Shared Execution-Clock Drifting (SECD), which makes execution rhythm an explicit part of one-step action generation. Conditioned on an observation and a latent sample, the policy jointly predicts a progress-indexed action curve and a shared monotone clock that maps fixed control times to locations on the curve. Demonstration-derived alignment anchors this decomposition, which is trained jointly through drifting on the decoded actions. The resulting policy retains a fixed-rate control interface and requires one network evaluation. We evaluate SECD across four real-robot tasks with inference on NVIDIA Thor. Across 300 trials, it achieves 77.00% task-averaged success and outperforms the evaluated one-step baselines on every task, including 91% success in cup retrieval from a 16 m/min conveyor and 54% in restoring and folding a crumpled shirt within 90 s. A fixed-clock variant reaches 79% on the same conveyor protocol. Complementary state-based RoboMimic experiments, including cross-seed ablations on Transport and Square, further support the joint design of the temporal representation and demonstration alignment. Project page: https://secd-anonymous-ewn.pages.dev/

Abstract:Manipulation under time constraints requires both accurate actions and an execution rhythm that matches the evolving scene. This becomes critical when a robot must intercept moving objects or complete a sequence of adjustments before a deadline. Although one-step policies reduce generation cost, their directly predicted action sequences leave temporal allocation implicit. We propose Shared Execution-Clock Drifting (SECD), which makes execution rhythm an explicit part of one-step action generation. Conditioned on an observation and a latent sample, the policy jointly predicts a progress-indexed action curve and a shared monotone clock that maps fixed control times to locations on the curve. Demonstration-derived alignment anchors this decomposition, which is trained jointly through drifting on the decoded actions. The resulting policy retains a fixed-rate control interface and requires one network evaluation. We evaluate SECD across four real-robot tasks with inference on NVIDIA Thor. Across 300 trials, it achieves 77.00% task-averaged success and outperforms the evaluated one-step baselines on every task, including 91% success in cup retrieval from a 16 m/min conveyor and 54% in restoring and folding a crumpled shirt within 90 s. A fixed-clock variant reaches 79% on the same conveyor protocol. Complementary state-based RoboMimic experiments, including cross-seed ablations on Transport and Square, further support the joint design of the temporal representation and demonstration alignment. Project page: this https URL

8 pages. Project page: this https URL

Robotics (cs.RO)

arXiv:2609.23305 [cs.RO]

(or arXiv:2609.23305v1 [cs.RO] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.23305 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 317 words

Related coverage