aiqbench analysis
This research introduces a robust sequential testing framework using adaptive betting on Kernel Conditional Independence statistics, specifically designed to mitigate Type I error inflation caused by distribution estimation errors in the Model-X paradigm. By combining normalization and calibration strategies, the method maintains high statistical power across both synthetic benchmarks and real-world fairness tasks where exact conditional distributions are unknown or estimated.
Sequential Kernel-based Conditional Independence Testing via Adaptive Betting
arXiv:2606.18993v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Testing conditional independence is fundamental yet intrinsically difficult: without additional assumptions, Type I error control is impossible in general. The "Model-X'' paradigm addresses this difficulty by assuming exact knowledge of a relevant conditional distribution. While small deviations from this assumption can sometimes be tolerated in classical one-shot testing, existing sequential conditional independence tests typically require the Model-X conditional to be known exactly, making them fragile when it must instead be estimated. We propose a new approach that is substantially more robust to such estimation error. Our method applies testing-by-betting to an adaptively optimized Kernel Conditional Independence statistic, together with a normalization scheme and a truncate-and-shift calibration strategy. These modifications greatly reduce Type I error inflation while preserving high power across high-dimensional synthetic benchmarks and real-world fairness tasks, outperforming existing sequential Model-X approaches. Code is available at https://github.com/he-zh/SKCI.
Abstract:Testing conditional independence is fundamental yet intrinsically difficult: without additional assumptions, Type I error control is impossible in general. The "Model-X'' paradigm addresses this difficulty by assuming exact knowledge of a relevant conditional distribution. While small deviations from this assumption can sometimes be tolerated in classical one-shot testing, existing sequential conditional independence tests typically require the Model-X conditional to be known exactly, making them fragile when it must instead be estimated. We propose a new approach that is substantially more robust to such estimation error. Our method applies testing-by-betting to an adaptively optimized Kernel Conditional Independence statistic, together with a normalization scheme and a truncate-and-shift calibration strategy. These modifications greatly reduce Type I error inflation while preserving high power across high-dimensional synthetic benchmarks and real-world fairness tasks, outperforming existing sequential Model-X approaches. Code is available at this https URL.
Machine Learning (stat.ML); Machine Learning (cs.LG); Methodology (stat.ME)
arXiv:2606.18993 [stat.ML]
(or arXiv:2606.18993v2 [stat.ML] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.18993 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 236 words
Related coverage

PIRAMID: Progress and Plans
LessWrong · Jul 27, 2026

[AINews] not much happened today
Latent Space · Sep 10, 2026

[AINews] Meta Muse Wonder & Wonder Full: MSL’s Claude 5.5-tier Frontier Model
Latent Space · Oct 13, 2026

How Would We Know? Reflections on trying to make AI go well amid deep uncertainty
LessWrong · Oct 5, 2026