aiqbench analysis
This paper addresses a critical gap in agentic AI development by distinguishing between what systems can technically do versus what they are organizationally permitted to execute. It proposes a structured governance framework that maps autonomy levels from reactive execution to delegated operational authority, explicitly linking each tier to corresponding requirements for risk management and accountability. By demonstrating how high-capability agents can be safely constrained based on organizational readiness, the work offers essential guidance for deploying autonomous systems in enterprise environments without conflating technical potential with authorized action.
Separating Capability from Permission: A Governance Framework for Agentic AI Autonomy Levels
arXiv:2607.23438v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: As AI systems increasingly exhibit agentic behavior, discussions of autonomy often conflate what systems are technically capable of doing with what they should be permitted to do in practice. This paper introduces a governance framework that explicitly separates Allowed Autonomy Levels (AAL), which define the degree of autonomy an AI agent is authorized to exercise given risk, oversight, and accountability considerations, from Autonomous Capability Levels (ACL), which characterize an agent's inherent technical abilities. We present a structured set of autonomy levels spanning reactive execution, decision support, supervised action, goal-directed autonomy, and delegated operational authority, and describe how control, reversibility, and accountability change as autonomy increases. To operationalize this framework, we propose a risk-aware decision process for assigning allowed autonomy, analyze how risk and accountability evolve across autonomy levels, and demonstrate its application through a deployed enterprise data engineering agent, illustrating how a system assessed at a high capability level can be deliberately constrained to a lower allowed autonomy based on risk, reversibility, and organizational readiness. By distinguishing authorization from capability, this work provides practical guidance for the design, deployment, and governance of Agentic AI systems.
Abstract:As AI systems increasingly exhibit agentic behavior, discussions of autonomy often conflate what systems are technically capable of doing with what they should be permitted to do in practice. This paper introduces a governance framework that explicitly separates Allowed Autonomy Levels (AAL), which define the degree of autonomy an AI agent is authorized to exercise given risk, oversight, and accountability considerations, from Autonomous Capability Levels (ACL), which characterize an agent's inherent technical abilities. We present a structured set of autonomy levels spanning reactive execution, decision support, supervised action, goal-directed autonomy, and delegated operational authority, and describe how control, reversibility, and accountability change as autonomy increases. To operationalize this framework, we propose a risk-aware decision process for assigning allowed autonomy, analyze how risk and accountability evolve across autonomy levels, and demonstrate its application through a deployed enterprise data engineering agent, illustrating how a system assessed at a high capability level can be deliberately constrained to a lower allowed autonomy based on risk, reversibility, and organizational readiness. By distinguishing authorization from capability, this work provides practical guidance for the design, deployment, and governance of Agentic AI systems.
Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computers and Society (cs.CY); Multiagent Systems (cs.MA)
arXiv:2607.23438 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2607.23438v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.23438 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 286 words
Related coverage

Podcast: Securing AI Agents: Identity, Authorization, and the DPACT Framework
InfoQ · Sep 21, 2026

Deconfusing Corrigibility
AI Alignment Forum · Oct 17, 2026

Run AI agents longer and safer with NVIDIA’s OpenShell runtime
Quantum Zeitgeist · Sep 28, 2026

A shared agentic platform for Wood Mackenzie, on Amazon Bedrock AgentCore
AWS · Sep 17, 2026