Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Research

aiqbench analysis

This research introduces semantic motion anchors to bridge the gap between spoken text and gesture by discretizing 3D motions into natural-language primitives, effectively addressing the limitation of models that overemphasize low-level kinematics. The approach yields an 8.2% improvement in retrieval accuracy on the BEAT2 benchmark and demonstrates that semantically grounded retrieval produces gestures that better convey communicative intent in downstream generation tasks. By grounding motion embeddings in structured descriptions, this method advances co-speech gesture synthesis beyond generic motion patterns to capture specific symbolic content.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Semantic Motion Anchors: Bridging Motion and Meaning in Co-Speech Gestures

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2605.30608v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Learning a shared representation between spoken text and gesture is central to co-speech gesture retrieval, synthesis, and understanding, but remains challenging for semantically meaningful gestures whose communicative intent is not captured by motion alone. Direct contrastive alignment between transcripts and continuous motion embeddings often overemphasizes low-level kinematics and misses the symbolic content of semantic gestures. We propose semantic motion anchors, natural-language abstractions of gesture motion capturing physical form and communicative intent. Our method discretizes 3D gestures into body-hand motion primitives, verbalizes them into structured descriptions, and grounds them in the transcript to provide auxiliary contrastive supervision. On BEAT2, our method improves text-to-gesture R@1 by 8.2% over a direct text-motion baseline and outperforms prior retrieval approaches on text to gesture and gesture to text retrieval directions. Beyond aggregate retrieval metrics, semantic motion anchor supervision helps retrieve gestures that are semantically meaningful for the spoken query, rather than defaulting to generic motion patterns. A downstream retrieval-augmented gesture generation study showed that users significantly preferred gestures retrieved by our approach over a retrieval-augmented generation baseline, demonstrating that semantically grounded retrieval translates to gestures that better convey communicative intent in downstream generation.

Abstract:Learning a shared representation between spoken text and gesture is central to co-speech gesture retrieval, synthesis, and understanding, but remains challenging for semantically meaningful gestures whose communicative intent is not captured by motion alone. Direct contrastive alignment between transcripts and continuous motion embeddings often overemphasizes low-level kinematics and misses the symbolic content of semantic gestures. We propose semantic motion anchors, natural-language abstractions of gesture motion capturing physical form and communicative intent. Our method discretizes 3D gestures into body-hand motion primitives, verbalizes them into structured descriptions, and grounds them in the transcript to provide auxiliary contrastive supervision. On BEAT2, our method improves text-to-gesture R@1 by 8.2% over a direct text-motion baseline and outperforms prior retrieval approaches on text to gesture and gesture to text retrieval directions. Beyond aggregate retrieval metrics, semantic motion anchor supervision helps retrieve gestures that are semantically meaningful for the spoken query, rather than defaulting to generic motion patterns. A downstream retrieval-augmented gesture generation study showed that users significantly preferred gestures retrieved by our approach over a retrieval-augmented generation baseline, demonstrating that semantically grounded retrieval translates to gestures that better convey communicative intent in downstream generation.

Computation and Language (cs.CL)

arXiv:2605.30608 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2605.30608v3 [cs.CL] for this version)

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 200 words

Related coverage