Skip to content
aiqbench takeQuantum Computing

aiqbench analysis

This research presents a method for device-independent self-testing of ideal quantum measurements using bipartite Bell test statistics, advancing the theoretical verification of non-demolition measurement protocols. By certifying whether added measurements are ideal without relying on trusted devices, the study strengthens foundational tools for verifying quantum hardware and communication security.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Self-testing ideal quantum measurements

arXiv1 min read

arXiv:2610.03168v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: A fundamental prediction of quantum mechanics is that observables can be measured through ideal measurements, that is, measurements that give the same outcome when repeated and do not disturb any observable that is jointly measurable. In terms of quantum instruments, such an ideal measurement is described by projective effects together with the associated Luders state-update rule. Here, we show that quantum mechanics allows for self-testing any ideal measurement. Using solely the output statistics of bipartite Bell tests in which a non-demolition measurement is sometimes added, it is possible to certify in a device-independent manner whether the added measurement is ideal.

Abstract:A fundamental prediction of quantum mechanics is that observables can be measured through ideal measurements, that is, measurements that give the same outcome when repeated and do not disturb any observable that is jointly measurable. In terms of quantum instruments, such an ideal measurement is described by projective effects together with the associated Luders state-update rule. Here, we show that quantum mechanics allows for self-testing any ideal measurement. Using solely the output statistics of bipartite Bell tests in which a non-demolition measurement is sometimes added, it is possible to certify in a device-independent manner whether the added measurement is ideal.

arXiv:2610.03168 [quant-ph]

(or arXiv:2610.03168v1 [quant-ph] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.03168 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 191 words

Related coverage