aiqbench analysis
This study investigates the efficacy of self-supervised pretraining using LeJEPA for molecular graph neural networks, finding that while it enhances representation quality and frozen probes, it fails to deliver robust performance gains during standard finetuning. The authors conclude that pretrained embeddings offer a complementary signal best utilized by combining them with traditional Morgan fingerprints rather than relying on end-to-end finetuning alone. These findings clarify the current limitations of transfer learning in cheminformatics, distinguishing between improved latent representations and actual predictive utility.
Self-Supervised Pretraining of Molecular Graph Encoders with LeJEPA
arXiv:2609.04261v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Self-supervised pretraining has transformed language and vision, but its value for molecular graph neural networks remains contested. We ask whether pretraining on a large unlabelled corpus improves molecular property prediction. We adapt LeJEPA, a predictor-free joint-embedding predictive architecture regularised by Sketched Isotropic Gaussian Regularisation (SIGReg), to molecular graphs, evaluating GPS and Chemprop-style D-MPNN encoders on the Wong et al. [1] antibiotic-activity dataset and ogbg-molhiv using a multi-seed, bootstrap-based protocol. Pretraining improves learned representations but does not robustly improve finetuning. A frozen probe on pretrained embeddings exceeds random initialisation on both tasks (ogbg-molhiv ROC-AUC 0.788 vs 0.665; +0.123), reaching the published self-supervised band, but this does not translate into finetuning gains. On the antibiotic scaffold split, a canonical partition is significant (delta AUPRC +0.041, p = 0.010), but the effect vanishes across five partitions (pooled +0.013, p = 0.095). Finetuning is null on the random split, ogbg-molhiv, and D-MPNN. The representational edge is nevertheless recoverable. Embeddings saturate at ~16-32 effective dimensions, whereas Morgan fingerprints improve to 1024 bits. At matched dimensionality, fingerprints lead validation (0.799 vs 0.782 at 128 dimensions) but trail shifted test scaffolds (0.759 vs 0.788). Truncating embeddings and combining them with a 1024-bit Morgan fingerprint raises ogbg-molhiv ROC-AUC from 0.805 to 0.832 (delta +0.027; 95% CI [+0.003, +0.054]; p = 0.014); an untrained encoder gains nothing (delta -0.003). Thus, pretraining supplies complementary information best realised through feature-level combination, while finetuning gains are weak and partition-dependent.
Abstract:Self-supervised pretraining has transformed language and vision, but its value for molecular graph neural networks remains contested. We ask whether pretraining on a large unlabelled corpus improves molecular property prediction. We adapt LeJEPA, a predictor-free joint-embedding predictive architecture regularised by Sketched Isotropic Gaussian Regularisation (SIGReg), to molecular graphs, evaluating GPS and Chemprop-style D-MPNN encoders on the Wong et al. [1] antibiotic-activity dataset and ogbg-molhiv using a multi-seed, bootstrap-based protocol. Pretraining improves learned representations but does not robustly improve finetuning. A frozen probe on pretrained embeddings exceeds random initialisation on both tasks (ogbg-molhiv ROC-AUC 0.788 vs 0.665; +0.123), reaching the published self-supervised band, but this does not translate into finetuning gains. On the antibiotic scaffold split, a canonical partition is significant (delta AUPRC +0.041, p = 0.010), but the effect vanishes across five partitions (pooled +0.013, p = 0.095). Finetuning is null on the random split, ogbg-molhiv, and D-MPNN. The representational edge is nevertheless recoverable. Embeddings saturate at ~16-32 effective dimensions, whereas Morgan fingerprints improve to 1024 bits. At matched dimensionality, fingerprints lead validation (0.799 vs 0.782 at 128 dimensions) but trail shifted test scaffolds (0.759 vs 0.788). Truncating embeddings and combining them with a 1024-bit Morgan fingerprint raises ogbg-molhiv ROC-AUC from 0.805 to 0.832 (delta +0.027; 95% CI [+0.003, +0.054]; p = 0.014); an untrained encoder gains nothing (delta -0.003). Thus, pretraining supplies complementary information best realised through feature-level combination, while finetuning gains are weak and partition-dependent.
Quantitative Methods (q-bio.QM); Machine Learning (cs.LG); Machine Learning (stat.ML)
arXiv:2609.04261 [q-bio.QM]
(or arXiv:2609.04261v1 [q-bio.QM] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.04261 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 335 words
Related coverage
Learning the Neighborhood: Contrast-Free Multimodal Self-Supervised Molecular Graph Pretraining
arXiv · Jun 3, 2026
Probabilistic Contrastive Pretraining for Multi-task ADME Property Prediction
arXiv · Jun 12, 2026
Graph Learning on Ensembles of Cyclic Peptides: An Investigation of Molecular Ensemble Modeling
arXiv · Jul 24, 2026
Multi-View Molecular Representation Learning with Hierarchical Graphs and Contextualized Fingerprints
arXiv · Sep 16, 2026