aiqbench analysis
This research critically examines the gap between theoretical sparsity metrics and actual inference speedups in Fourier Neural Operators, revealing that significant parameter reductions often fail to lower latency without specific execution path optimizations. The study provides essential insights for researchers aiming to deploy efficient physics-informed models by highlighting that merely pruning parameters is insufficient if the underlying computational transforms remain dense.
Selection, Representation, and Execution in Sparse Fourier Neural Operators
arXiv:2608.30070v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Sparse representations are often expected to make models smaller and also reduce inference cost. For Fourier Neural Operators (FNOs), these objectives are not equivalent or do not always align: removing parts of the learned operator can leave the underlying transforms and dense computations unchanged, while changing the grid on which the model is evaluated can introduce overhead of its own. We therefore distinguish sparsity in the representation, in the stored parameters, in the theoretical operation count, and in measured runtime, and present an empirical study of several routes toward sparse FNOs that tests each transition between them separately. Coarsening the execution grid reduces the theoretical cost without reducing measured latency, and adding a correction term recovers accuracy at the cost of making the model slower. Even an 83\% parameter reduction remains slower than the dense baseline under ordinary execution. These results motivate a stricter definition of useful sparsity: the deployed operator must preserve solution accuracy and map its reduced support to a genuinely cheaper execution path.
Abstract:Sparse representations are often expected to make models smaller and also reduce inference cost. For Fourier Neural Operators (FNOs), these objectives are not equivalent or do not always align: removing parts of the learned operator can leave the underlying transforms and dense computations unchanged, while changing the grid on which the model is evaluated can introduce overhead of its own. We therefore distinguish sparsity in the representation, in the stored parameters, in the theoretical operation count, and in measured runtime, and present an empirical study of several routes toward sparse FNOs that tests each transition between them separately. Coarsening the execution grid reduces the theoretical cost without reducing measured latency, and adding a correction term recovers accuracy at the cost of making the model slower. Even an 83\% parameter reduction remains slower than the dense baseline under ordinary execution. These results motivate a stricter definition of useful sparsity: the deployed operator must preserve solution accuracy and map its reduced support to a genuinely cheaper execution path.
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Numerical Analysis (math.NA)
I.2.6; G.1.8; C.4
arXiv:2608.30070 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2608.30070v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.30070 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 266 words
