aiqbench analysis
This research introduces a synchronous multi-channel analysis method for heart sound classification, leveraging a selection algorithm to optimize input segments from four auscultation spots. By utilizing a multi-input CNN to process these sounds simultaneously, the approach achieves a 96.5% accuracy rate, significantly outperforming single-channel and asynchronous methods. The study demonstrates that mimicking physician procedures through synchronized channel analysis can effectively capture inter-channel phenomena for improved cardiovascular disease screening.
Selection of Heart Sound Segments for Synchronous Classification of Multi-channel Heart Sounds
arXiv:2608.21499v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Cardiac auscultation remains the most cost-effective screening procedure for cardiovascular diseases, and requires listening at the four main auscultation spots. Despite this, automatic heart sound analysis algorithms mostly classify patients using a single heart sound (single-channel), or, when using more than one (multi-channel), analyze each channel individually. To our knowledge, no prior work classifies patients through the synchronous analysis of multi-channel heart sounds, following the procedure used by physicians. This motivates us to study whether synchronous multi-channel analysis outperforms single-channel approaches, and whether it holds an advantage over asynchronous multi-channel methods that analyze channels one by one, potentially by capturing inter-channel interference phenomena. To answer these questions, we introduce a selection algorithm that identifies optimal heart sound segments from each of the four auscultation spots, which are then fed into a multi-input CNN that classifies patients by analyzing the four selected sounds simultaneously. Our synchronous approach, combining the proposed selection algorithm with a multi-input CNN, achieves a superior overall accuracy of 96.5\%, a 9.1\% gain over the best-performing single-channel and asynchronous multi-channel methods. The benefit of the proposed segment selection strategy over random selection is confirmed by a paired statistical significance test ($p = 0.003$). These results were obtained on 735 patients from the CirCor DigiScope dataset with complete recordings from all four spots, and their scope and generalizability are discussed in light of this and other methodological considerations.
Abstract:Cardiac auscultation remains the most cost-effective screening procedure for cardiovascular diseases, and requires listening at the four main auscultation spots. Despite this, automatic heart sound analysis algorithms mostly classify patients using a single heart sound (single-channel), or, when using more than one (multi-channel), analyze each channel individually. To our knowledge, no prior work classifies patients through the synchronous analysis of multi-channel heart sounds, following the procedure used by physicians. This motivates us to study whether synchronous multi-channel analysis outperforms single-channel approaches, and whether it holds an advantage over asynchronous multi-channel methods that analyze channels one by one, potentially by capturing inter-channel interference phenomena. To answer these questions, we introduce a selection algorithm that identifies optimal heart sound segments from each of the four auscultation spots, which are then fed into a multi-input CNN that classifies patients by analyzing the four selected sounds simultaneously. Our synchronous approach, combining the proposed selection algorithm with a multi-input CNN, achieves a superior overall accuracy of 96.5\%, a 9.1\% gain over the best-performing single-channel and asynchronous multi-channel methods. The benefit of the proposed segment selection strategy over random selection is confirmed by a paired statistical significance test ($p = 0.003$). These results were obtained on 735 patients from the CirCor DigiScope dataset with complete recordings from all four spots, and their scope and generalizability are discussed in light of this and other methodological considerations.
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2608.21499 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2608.21499v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.21499 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 324 words
Related coverage

2026.8: Approachable by design
Home Assistant · Aug 5, 2026

Game-Theoretic Disempowerment: Loss of Control to Agencyless AI
LessWrong · Sep 27, 2026

2026.9: There's room on this bus
Home Assistant · Sep 2, 2026

Article: Artificial Intelligence-Driven Phishing: How Phishing Technique Is Evolving and Implemented
InfoQ · Jun 8, 2026