aiqbench analysis
This study dissects the internal mechanics of reinforcement learning post-training in reasoning models by identifying two distinct pathways: strategy selection via diverse supervision and strategy improvement through increased data difficulty. By isolating these processes using controlled experiments on Qwen-2.5, the research offers actionable insights for scaling model capabilities beyond current empirical trends.
Select and Improve: Understanding the Mechanics of Post-Training for Reasoning
arXiv:2606.13125v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Reinforcement learning has rapidly emerged as a key component in the training of reasoning and coding models, yet it remains poorly understood from a mechanistic perspective. We study how and through what underlying processes capabilities are acquired or enhanced via reinforcement learning post-training. Our analysis, based on controlled math reasoning experiments with Qwen-2.5-1.5B, reveals two core mechanisms: strategy selection and strategy improvement. Our results highlight the role of SFT data and reinforcement learning data in activating these mechanisms, in particular showing how supervising the model on diverse reasoning strategies can enable strategy selection and how increasing difficulty in reinforcement learning data can enable strategy improvement. Taken together, our results provide mechanistic insight into RL training and suggest practical interventions to continue scaling reasoning capabilities.
Abstract:Reinforcement learning has rapidly emerged as a key component in the training of reasoning and coding models, yet it remains poorly understood from a mechanistic perspective. We study how and through what underlying processes capabilities are acquired or enhanced via reinforcement learning post-training. Our analysis, based on controlled math reasoning experiments with Qwen-2.5-1.5B, reveals two core mechanisms: strategy selection and strategy improvement. Our results highlight the role of SFT data and reinforcement learning data in activating these mechanisms, in particular showing how supervising the model on diverse reasoning strategies can enable strategy selection and how increasing difficulty in reinforcement learning data can enable strategy improvement. Taken together, our results provide mechanistic insight into RL training and suggest practical interventions to continue scaling reasoning capabilities.
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2606.13125 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2606.13125v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.13125 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 221 words
Related coverage

How an assessor could investigate evidence of acceleration from the automation of AI R&D
METR · Oct 14, 2026

Build Faster, Work Smarter with AI Agents and Apps Grounded in Data
Snowflake Blog · Nov 3, 2026
Personas in a Pre-Internet Language Model
LessWrong · Oct 13, 2026
Why Do Naive SFT Filters For Safety Properties Fail?
AI Alignment Forum · Jun 14, 2026