aiqbench analysis
This research addresses a critical gap in robotic manipulation by introducing privileged noise distillation to correct coordinate frame errors caused by pose uncertainty. The authors demonstrate that incorporating latent offset information during training allows policies to maintain high success rates on the FORGE benchmark under significant noise conditions, outperforming standard state-based baselines. This work advances machine learning for robotics by providing a robust method for vision-force integration in precision assembly tasks where sensor data is inherently noisy.
Seeing Through the Displaced Frame: Privileged Noise Distillation for Vision-Force Precision Assembly
arXiv:2610.07745v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Pose error in precision assembly can corrupt not only what a robot observes but also the coordinate frame in which it acts. On the FORGE benchmark, the official state-based policy succeeds in 97% to 99% of episodes with the true pose but only 32% to 60% at the benchmark's $\sigma=5$ mm pose-noise setting. The same estimated pose enters the observation and anchors the action frame, making the offset unidentifiable from proprioceptive state alone before contact. We supply this missing information during training in two ways. A privileged teacher observes the offset in simulation, while clean demonstrations can instead be relabelled into the displaced frame in closed form. The deployed student is trained with behaviour cloning followed by one DAgger round and receives only noisy state, a raw wrench window, and two RGB cameras at test time. On the unmodified FORGE tasks, the teacher-route student maintains 92% to 99% success across $\sigma=0$ to 5 mm, while six non-privileged baselines fall to 2% to 80%. A matched behaviour-cloning experiment isolates the source of this robustness. With the same student architecture, data budget, and training procedure, demonstrations generated without offset access yield only 31.5% success at $\sigma=5$ mm, whereas privileged and relabelled demonstrations reach 88.7% and 95.8%. Deployed zero-shot on a Franka, the student reaches 83.3% pooled success at $\sigma=5$ mm against 34.4% for the strongest state-based policy. Deployable sensing alone is insufficient. Robustness requires supervision that encodes compensation for the latent frame offset.Project page: https://drychang.github.io/displaced-frame/
Abstract:Pose error in precision assembly can corrupt not only what a robot observes but also the coordinate frame in which it acts. On the FORGE benchmark, the official state-based policy succeeds in 97% to 99% of episodes with the true pose but only 32% to 60% at the benchmark's $\sigma=5$ mm pose-noise setting. The same estimated pose enters the observation and anchors the action frame, making the offset unidentifiable from proprioceptive state alone before contact. We supply this missing information during training in two ways. A privileged teacher observes the offset in simulation, while clean demonstrations can instead be relabelled into the displaced frame in closed form. The deployed student is trained with behaviour cloning followed by one DAgger round and receives only noisy state, a raw wrench window, and two RGB cameras at test time. On the unmodified FORGE tasks, the teacher-route student maintains 92% to 99% success across $\sigma=0$ to 5 mm, while six non-privileged baselines fall to 2% to 80%. A matched behaviour-cloning experiment isolates the source of this robustness. With the same student architecture, data budget, and training procedure, demonstrations generated without offset access yield only 31.5% success at $\sigma=5$ mm, whereas privileged and relabelled demonstrations reach 88.7% and 95.8%. Deployed zero-shot on a Franka, the student reaches 83.3% pooled success at $\sigma=5$ mm against 34.4% for the strongest state-based policy. Deployable sensing alone is insufficient. Robustness requires supervision that encodes compensation for the latent frame this http URL page: this https URL
Robotics (cs.RO)
arXiv:2610.07745 [cs.RO]
(or arXiv:2610.07745v1 [cs.RO] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.07745 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 340 words
Related coverage

Runway’s WorldPrompt and the Engineering of Real-Time Worlds
Latent Space · Sep 25, 2026
Dyna-2: General Purpose Physical Agents with Hour-Long Autonomy — Jason Ma, Dyna Robotics
Latent Space · Oct 13, 2026

[AINews] Claude Fable/Mythos 5.1: new SOTA model, 75% cache price cut but 70% more output tokens
Latent Space · Sep 2, 2026

Game Design Creativity evals
LessWrong · Oct 12, 2026