Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Safety

aiqbench analysis

This research exposes a critical vulnerability in Vision Language Models where visual styling, such as text color and contrast, artificially biases sentiment analysis and degrades Visual Question Answering performance. By introducing "Stealth Visual Prompts," the study demonstrates that VLMs rely heavily on non-semantic cues like green coloring for positive words rather than true semantic understanding, leading to systematic errors in industrial applications. These findings underscore the urgent need for robustness testing against visual perturbations as these models are deployed in high-stakes decision-making environments.
Sources coveringarXiv, LessWrong, MIT News, Quantum Frontiers
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Seeing Red, Thinking Bad: Color Bias in Vision Language Models

arXiv3 min read

arXiv:2608.14286v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Vision language models (VLMs) are increasingly used in industrial decision-making systems, such as recruitment support and recommendation. This motivates careful analysis of how VLMs process visual and textual information. In this work, we study how VLMs interpret text rendered as an image, and investigate the influence of visual styling biases. To this end, we introduce Stealth Visual Prompts, which subtly change visual styling of text, such as color and contrast, while preserving semantic content. Using these prompts, we systematically control the visual styling of words in text and measure their impact on the analysis performed by VLMs. We further analyze how such visual perturbations affect the latent representations of the vision encoder. From our experiments, we observed that coloring positive words in green consistently shifts sentiment predictions toward a positive direction. As a result, VLMs often fail to properly account for negative words present in the text. Our analysis suggests that this behavior is correlated with changes in the latent representations of the vision encoder induced by color variations. In addition, we show that reducing text--background contrast increases reliance on visually salient cues and leads to more incorrect Visual Question Answering (VQA) outputs. These results suggest that the visual styling of rendered text can guide VLMs' interpretation in ways that diverge from human semantic understanding. Project page: https://github.com/KohsukeIde/color-bias-vlm

Abstract:Vision language models (VLMs) are increasingly used in industrial decision-making systems, such as recruitment support and recommendation. This motivates careful analysis of how VLMs process visual and textual information. In this work, we study how VLMs interpret text rendered as an image, and investigate the influence of visual styling biases. To this end, we introduce Stealth Visual Prompts, which subtly change visual styling of text, such as color and contrast, while preserving semantic content. Using these prompts, we systematically control the visual styling of words in text and measure their impact on the analysis performed by VLMs. We further analyze how such visual perturbations affect the latent representations of the vision encoder. From our experiments, we observed that coloring positive words in green consistently shifts sentiment predictions toward a positive direction. As a result, VLMs often fail to properly account for negative words present in the text. Our analysis suggests that this behavior is correlated with changes in the latent representations of the vision encoder induced by color variations. In addition, we show that reducing text--background contrast increases reliance on visually salient cues and leads to more incorrect Visual Question Answering (VQA) outputs. These results suggest that the visual styling of rendered text can guide VLMs' interpretation in ways that diverge from human semantic understanding. Project page: this https URL

15 pages. Accepted to ICPR 2026

Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computation and Language (cs.CL)

arXiv:2608.14286 [cs.CV]

(or arXiv:2608.14286v1 [cs.CV] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.14286 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

In: Pattern Recognition. ICPR 2026. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer, Cham, pp. 261-275

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-31583-0_18 Focus to learn more DOI(s) linking to related resources

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 354 words

Related coverage