aiqbench analysis
This research introduces SEAR, a novel benchmark that shifts audio deepfake detection evaluation from assessing plausible rationales to verifying underlying acoustic evidence. By equipping language models with controlled acoustic tools, the study demonstrates a critical gap between generated explanations and verifiable forensic data, offering a more rigorous framework for evaluating Audio Language Models.
SEAR: Spoofing Evidence-Grounded Audio Reasoning Benchmark for Audio Language Models
arXiv:2609.39847v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Audio language models (ALMs) are increasingly used for audio deepfake detection (ADD), yet existing benchmarks assess their verdicts or rationale plausibility without verifying the underlying acoustic evidence. To address this issue, we first introduce spoofing evidence-grounded audio reasoning (SEAR), a four-task AQA benchmark to evaluate ALM-based ADD through acoustic evidence identification and quantification, deepfake detection, and forensic rationale generation. We further propose a bona-fide-based acoustic evidence agent (BAEA), which equips a frozen ALM with controlled acoustic tools under \textsc{fixed} or \textsc{adaptive} evidence-acquisition policies. Experiments with six ALMs reveal a clear gap between plausible rationales and verifiable acoustic evidence reasoning, while BAEA-\textsc{Fixed} improves final verdicts and forensic rationales on both evaluation partitions. Controlled interventions further show that misleading evidence degrades both detection and grounding performance.
Abstract:Audio language models (ALMs) are increasingly used for audio deepfake detection (ADD), yet existing benchmarks assess their verdicts or rationale plausibility without verifying the underlying acoustic evidence. To address this issue, we first introduce spoofing evidence-grounded audio reasoning (SEAR), a four-task AQA benchmark to evaluate ALM-based ADD through acoustic evidence identification and quantification, deepfake detection, and forensic rationale generation. We further propose a bona-fide-based acoustic evidence agent (BAEA), which equips a frozen ALM with controlled acoustic tools under \textsc{fixed} or \textsc{adaptive} evidence-acquisition policies. Experiments with six ALMs reveal a clear gap between plausible rationales and verifiable acoustic evidence reasoning, while BAEA-\textsc{Fixed} improves final verdicts and forensic rationales on both evaluation partitions. Controlled interventions further show that misleading evidence degrades both detection and grounding performance.
Sound (cs.SD); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2609.39847 [cs.SD]
(or arXiv:2609.39847v1 [cs.SD] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.39847 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 220 words
Related coverage

Brief independent investigation of agents’ behavior, reasoning and collaboration in the OpenAI / Hugging Face hacking incident
METR · Aug 26, 2026
OmniCompass: A Holistic Benchmark for Omni-Modal Video Grounding and Understanding
arXiv · Oct 14, 2026
Reinforcement Learning with Evolving Rubrics as Rewards for Audio Reasoning
arXiv · Aug 6, 2026
OmniReasoning: Pushing the Limits of Audio-Visual Joint Reasoning
arXiv · Oct 1, 2026