Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Research

aiqbench analysis

This research addresses a critical failure mode in Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) where standard loss balancing incorrectly penalizes valid deviations from signed-distance properties in level-set advection. The authors introduce SDF-Aware Weighting, an adaptive mechanism that dynamically excludes these legitimate departures to prevent the network from converging to incorrect solutions. By automating hyperparameter selection across diverse benchmarks, this method significantly improves accuracy on complex geometries without sacrificing performance on standard rigid motion tasks.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

SDF-Aware Weighting: Adaptive Eikonal Regularisation for Three-Dimensional Level-Set Physics-Informed Neural Networks

arXiv3 min read

arXiv:2608.08322v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Adaptive loss-balancing schemes for physics-informed neural networks rest on a premise that every residual should be driven to zero. For level-set advection with an eikonal regulariser that premise fails: the eikonal term penalises deviation of $\lVert\nabla\phi\rVert$ from unity, a property transport preserves only under rigid motion; where the exact solution departs from a signed-distance function the eikonal residual of the correct answer is nonzero, and driving it to zero moves the network away from that answer. We show that standard gradient-norm balancing fails in exactly this way, its weight remaining near its initial value throughout training on benchmarks where the property is violated, and we introduce SDF-Aware Weighting (SAW), which combines a residual-quantile gate with a gradient-norm ratio so that points exhibiting legitimate departure are excluded before the surviving term is scaled. Across four three-dimensional benchmarks SAW selects an eikonal weight within an order of magnitude of the value located by an eighteen-run manual sweep, spanning four decades from $10^{-1}$ to $10^{-5}$ with a single fixed configuration. On the slotted sphere, where the initial field is non-differentiable at reentrant edges, SAW attains a lower error than any weight in that sweep. Two smooth rigid benchmarks serve as controls: SAW is worse there, as expected when its premise does not hold. An ablation with the gate disabled shows the slot is nearly entirely filled while the relative $L_2$ error reads $1.06\%$, indistinguishable from a field that never represented the slot. We give a feature-restricted measure that separates the two cases.

Abstract:Adaptive loss-balancing schemes for physics-informed neural networks rest on a premise that every residual should be driven to zero. For level-set advection with an eikonal regulariser that premise fails: the eikonal term penalises deviation of $\lVert\nabla\phi\rVert$ from unity, a property transport preserves only under rigid motion; where the exact solution departs from a signed-distance function the eikonal residual of the correct answer is nonzero, and driving it to zero moves the network away from that answer. We show that standard gradient-norm balancing fails in exactly this way, its weight remaining near its initial value throughout training on benchmarks where the property is violated, and we introduce SDF-Aware Weighting (SAW), which combines a residual-quantile gate with a gradient-norm ratio so that points exhibiting legitimate departure are excluded before the surviving term is scaled. Across four three-dimensional benchmarks SAW selects an eikonal weight within an order of magnitude of the value located by an eighteen-run manual sweep, spanning four decades from $10^{-1}$ to $10^{-5}$ with a single fixed configuration. On the slotted sphere, where the initial field is non-differentiable at reentrant edges, SAW attains a lower error than any weight in that sweep. Two smooth rigid benchmarks serve as controls: SAW is worse there, as expected when its premise does not hold. An ablation with the gate disabled shows the slot is nearly entirely filled while the relative $L_2$ error reads $1.06\%$, indistinguishable from a field that never represented the slot. We give a feature-restricted measure that separates the two cases.

37 pages, 15 figures, 7 tables, 1 algorithm. Submitted to Machine Learning: Science and Technology; under peer review

Fluid Dynamics (physics.flu-dyn); Machine Learning (cs.LG); Computational Physics (physics.comp-ph)

arXiv:2608.08322 [physics.flu-dyn]

(or arXiv:2608.08322v2 [physics.flu-dyn] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.08322 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 365 words

Related coverage