aiqbench analysis
This study provides empirical evidence that Large Language Models exhibit a distinct two-stage processing pattern regarding script knowledge, where input and output scripts are encoded early but commitment to the actual output emerges only in the final layers. The findings link this "late-layer commitment" directly to model depth, suggesting that achieving robust multilingual capabilities may require significantly deeper architectures to overcome intermediate defaults toward Latin representations.
Script Choice in LLMs: Evidence for Late-Layer Commitment
arXiv:2609.28784v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: In this paper, we investigate how script knowledge is distributed across the layers of LLMs using two complementary interpretability methods: logistic regression probing and logit-lens analysis. Our probing experiments reveal a clear asymmetry: both the input script and the instructed output script are encoded in the earliest layers of the network, while, in contrast, commitment to the actual output script emerges only in the final layers, with the model's intermediate representations defaulting to Latin throughout most of the layers. This two-stage process is confirmed by logit-lens analyses, which show that script commitment consistently occurs at the very last layers of the LLMs. Together with the weaker script-following performance observed in smaller models, these results form a converging body of evidence linking script commitment to model depth, with broader implications for the design of sufficiently deep, inclusive multilingual architectures.
Abstract:In this paper, we investigate how script knowledge is distributed across the layers of LLMs using two complementary interpretability methods: logistic regression probing and logit-lens analysis. Our probing experiments reveal a clear asymmetry: both the input script and the instructed output script are encoded in the earliest layers of the network, while, in contrast, commitment to the actual output script emerges only in the final layers, with the model's intermediate representations defaulting to Latin throughout most of the layers. This two-stage process is confirmed by logit-lens analyses, which show that script commitment consistently occurs at the very last layers of the LLMs. Together with the weaker script-following performance observed in smaller models, these results form a converging body of evidence linking script commitment to model depth, with broader implications for the design of sufficiently deep, inclusive multilingual architectures.
Computation and Language (cs.CL)
arXiv:2609.28784 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2609.28784v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.28784 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 233 words
Related coverage

Game Design Creativity evals
LessWrong · Oct 12, 2026
State of the Field: AI for Epistemics and Coordination
LessWrong · Oct 2, 2026
The Latin Substrate: How Language Models Represent and Mediate Script Choice
arXiv · Sep 9, 2026

Not Deciphering The Voynich Manuscript
LessWrong · Oct 11, 2026