aiqbench analysis
This paper introduces SCOPE, a new benchmark for schema induction from raw text, alongside SCION, an auditable reference pipeline designed to evaluate corpus-to-schema construction without relying on pre-existing ontologies. By establishing strict JSON contracts and evidence-linked outputs, the work addresses a critical upstream bottleneck in knowledge graph construction while demonstrating that open-model variants can outperform proprietary LLM baselines.
SCOPE and SCION: A Benchmark and an Auditable Reference Pipeline for Schema Induction and Fusion from Text
arXiv:2607.21610v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Schema graphs are an upstream bottleneck of schema-grounded information extraction and knowledge graph construction, yet most extraction systems assume the schema is already available. We introduce SCOPE (Schema Construction and Ontology-induction Pipeline Evaluation), a train-text-only benchmark for corpus-to-schema induction and optional schema fusion from raw text, built from 24 public information extraction sources (15 RE and 9 EE) normalized into evaluation-only gold schema graphs; its core event-extraction target covers event types and within-event argument roles, with inter-event links reported separately. We present SCION (Schema Construction and Induction with Ontology Normalization), an auditable reference pipeline rather than a new extraction architecture; it constructs candidate spaces from train text and restricts naming, merging, filtering, validation, and conservative fusion to candidate-linked evidence under strict JSON contracts. On the SCOPE core suite, SCION-lite attains the highest F1 among released source-schema references, Text2Onto-style, LLM-only, and matched extract-then-aggregate baselines under Literal, Fuzzy, Continuous, and Graph schema-graph metrics, while the compact open-model SCION-RL variant reduces reliance on proprietary LLM schema engineers. These results are reported against normalized typed-edge targets rather than as claims that induced schemas surpass human ontology design; the release includes evidence-linked outputs, parse/fallback logs, candidate retention/merging logs, run manifests, code, and benchmark packages at https://github.com/wandugu/paper_scion.
Abstract:Schema graphs are an upstream bottleneck of schema-grounded information extraction and knowledge graph construction, yet most extraction systems assume the schema is already available. We introduce SCOPE (Schema Construction and Ontology-induction Pipeline Evaluation), a train-text-only benchmark for corpus-to-schema induction and optional schema fusion from raw text, built from 24 public information extraction sources (15 RE and 9 EE) normalized into evaluation-only gold schema graphs; its core event-extraction target covers event types and within-event argument roles, with inter-event links reported separately. We present SCION (Schema Construction and Induction with Ontology Normalization), an auditable reference pipeline rather than a new extraction architecture; it constructs candidate spaces from train text and restricts naming, merging, filtering, validation, and conservative fusion to candidate-linked evidence under strict JSON contracts. On the SCOPE core suite, SCION-lite attains the highest F1 among released source-schema references, Text2Onto-style, LLM-only, and matched extract-then-aggregate baselines under Literal, Fuzzy, Continuous, and Graph schema-graph metrics, while the compact open-model SCION-RL variant reduces reliance on proprietary LLM schema engineers. These results are reported against normalized typed-edge targets rather than as claims that induced schemas surpass human ontology design; the release includes evidence-linked outputs, parse/fallback logs, candidate retention/merging logs, run manifests, code, and benchmark packages at this https URL.
Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2607.21610 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2607.21610v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.21610 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 298 words
Related coverage

Vertical Advantage: Transforming Industries with Lakebase and Agentic AI
Databricks · Aug 27, 2026

Introducing Mistral OCR 4
Mistral AI · Jun 23, 2026
Benchmarking Kimi-K3 Across vLLM, SGLang, and ATOM on MI350X
AMD · Sep 22, 2026

Building trust in AI agents: A production-ready evaluation framework with Amazon Bedrock AgentCore
AWS · Oct 16, 2026