Skip to content
aiqbench takeMachine Learning

aiqbench analysis

This survey examines how generative large language models are being applied to automate literature retrieval and screening within scientific research, addressing the bottleneck of manually navigating vast scholarly databases. By analyzing 34 peer-reviewed studies, it highlights current techniques in model adaptation, prompting strategies, and evaluation metrics for using LLMs as flexible alternatives to traditional search systems. The work underscores a shift toward AI-driven workflows that enhance efficiency in knowledge discovery across digital libraries and computational linguistics.
Sources coveringarXiv, terrytao.wordpress.com, Fortune
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Scientific Knowledge Discovery in the Age of Large Language Models

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2607.26670v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The rapid growth of scholarly literature has made identifying relevant publications increasingly difficult, and conventional search systems still depend heavily on manually formulated queries and effortful manual inspection. Generative large language models (LLMs) offer a more flexible alternative, supporting literature retrieval and the screening of candidate studies against eligibility criteria. This chapter surveys 34 peer-reviewed papers applying generative LLMs to these two tasks, identified via a Boolean search over the OpenAIRE Graph (1,589 records screened to 34 inclusions). Reviewed studies are characterised by LLMs employed, model access and adaptation, prompting and architectural techniques, ground-truth sources, and evaluation metrics.

Abstract:The rapid growth of scholarly literature has made identifying relevant publications increasingly difficult, and conventional search systems still depend heavily on manually formulated queries and effortful manual inspection. Generative large language models (LLMs) offer a more flexible alternative, supporting literature retrieval and the screening of candidate studies against eligibility criteria. This chapter surveys 34 peer-reviewed papers applying generative LLMs to these two tasks, identified via a Boolean search over the OpenAIRE Graph (1,589 records screened to 34 inclusions). Reviewed studies are characterised by LLMs employed, model access and adaptation, prompting and architectural techniques, ground-truth sources, and evaluation metrics.

Digital Libraries (cs.DL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computation and Language (cs.CL); Information Retrieval (cs.IR)

arXiv:2607.26670 [cs.DL]

(or arXiv:2607.26670v1 [cs.DL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.26670 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 202 words

Related coverage