aiqbench analysis
ScienceClaw introduces a rigorous evaluation framework for LLM agents in scientific automation, specifically addressing the critical gap of persistent program-level improvement across sequential tasks in natural and social sciences. By unifying task solving with verification and program updates, it quantifies evolutionary gain and retention while ensuring that only verified repairs are retained to prevent performance degradation. This work advances the field of AI for Science by providing a standardized metric for agent self-evolution beyond simple task completion rates.
ScienceClaw: Benchmarking Continual Self-Evolution of AI-for-Science Agents Across the Natural and Social Sciences
arXiv:2610.08691v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language model agents are accelerating scientific automation, yet verified executions rarely become persistent program-level improvements, and existing evaluations do not examine this process across sequential tasks in both the natural and social sciences. We formalize ScienceClaw as fixed-parameter program self-evolution that unifies task solving, scientific verification, and program updates. ScienceClaw-Eval spans 23 disciplines and measures scientific correctness, evolutionary gain, retention, cross-dataset transfer, and evolution cost through sequential streams and independent reset evaluation. Our framework repairs executable workflows through multi-turn interaction, converts re-execution-verified failure--success trajectories into linked Skill and Operator candidates, and retains an update only when source-task replay reproduces the repair and independent scientific tasks improve. Code is available at https://github.com/beita6969/ScienceClaw.
Abstract:Large language model agents are accelerating scientific automation, yet verified executions rarely become persistent program-level improvements, and existing evaluations do not examine this process across sequential tasks in both the natural and social sciences. We formalize ScienceClaw as fixed-parameter program self-evolution that unifies task solving, scientific verification, and program updates. ScienceClaw-Eval spans 23 disciplines and measures scientific correctness, evolutionary gain, retention, cross-dataset transfer, and evolution cost through sequential streams and independent reset evaluation. Our framework repairs executable workflows through multi-turn interaction, converts re-execution-verified failure--success trajectories into linked Skill and Operator candidates, and retains an update only when source-task replay reproduces the repair and independent scientific tasks improve. Code is available at this https URL.
Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2610.08691 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2610.08691v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.08691 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 208 words
Related coverage

Microsoft’s AI chief says superintelligence is near, but won’t take your job
The Verge · Jun 8, 2026
The J-Space Debate, Agent Swarms, and Pacing Frontier AI - Digital Minds Newsletter #4
LessWrong · Sep 18, 2026
When they can perform a task, AIs are much cheaper than humans
LessWrong · Sep 27, 2026
[AINews] Meta Connect 2026: Muse glasses, voice, video, and Charm
Latent Space · Sep 24, 2026