aiqbench analysis
SciCurateBench introduces a rigorous benchmark for verifying complex biological experimental criteria in raw literature, revealing significant limitations in current LLMs and agent-based systems. The proposed LangPoli framework demonstrates that integrating policy agents to generate action guidelines substantially improves structured information retrieval and paper classification performance. This work advances the practical utility of AI by addressing the specific challenges of curating heterogeneous scientific data rather than just answering broad queries.
SciCurateBench: Curating Experimental Data from Heterogeneous Scientific Literature with Verbal-Action Agents
arXiv:2610.14393v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Scientific research increasingly depends on curating experimental data from literature. Scientific data curation requires verifying exact experimental conditions (e.g., specific assays, clinical outcomes, and data availability) across long, heterogeneous files, which is a highly time-consuming process. Existing benchmarks evaluate only broad relevance on short queries, failing to capture this complexity. We introduce SciCurateBench, a benchmark of 200 expert-annotated papers from major life-science journals that challenges systems to verify conjunctive biological experimental criteria from raw, unprocessed scientific literature. We show that plain LLMs and popular reasoning, tool-using, and feedback-based agents all struggle with this task. To study what makes the task tractable, we further propose LangPoli, an integrative system in which a policy agent generates natural language action guidelines that actor agents convert into executable tools. LangPoli showed strong performance on both Paper Classification (83.16% F1 vs. 58.22% for its base LLM) and Structured Information Retrieval, and also improves re-ranking on the public benchmarks of LitSearch, BEIR, and TREC. We further explore curriculum transfer, a method that distills generalizable strategies from solved tasks to accelerate the solving of related problems. We hope this work facilitates research in truly practical scientific AI assistance. The anonymized pre-release can be found from https://anonymous.4open. science/r/scicuratebench-D885/.
Abstract:Scientific research increasingly depends on curating experimental data from literature. Scientific data curation requires verifying exact experimental conditions (e.g., specific assays, clinical outcomes, and data availability) across long, heterogeneous files, which is a highly time-consuming process. Existing benchmarks evaluate only broad relevance on short queries, failing to capture this complexity. We introduce SciCurateBench, a benchmark of 200 expert-annotated papers from major life-science journals that challenges systems to verify conjunctive biological experimental criteria from raw, unprocessed scientific literature. We show that plain LLMs and popular reasoning, tool-using, and feedback-based agents all struggle with this task. To study what makes the task tractable, we further propose LangPoli, an integrative system in which a policy agent generates natural language action guidelines that actor agents convert into executable tools. LangPoli showed strong performance on both Paper Classification (83.16% F1 vs. 58.22% for its base LLM) and Structured Information Retrieval, and also improves re-ranking on the public benchmarks of LitSearch, BEIR, and TREC. We further explore curriculum transfer, a method that distills generalizable strategies from solved tasks to accelerate the solving of related problems. We hope this work facilitates research in truly practical scientific AI assistance. The anonymized pre-release can be found from https://anonymous.4open. science/r/scicuratebench-D885/.
Computation and Language (cs.CL)
arXiv:2610.14393 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2610.14393v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.14393 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 295 words
Related coverage
OmniVCBench: Benchmarking Evidence-Grounded Multimodal Reasoning Towards AI Virtual Cells
arXiv · Sep 30, 2026
SciExplore: Evaluating Autonomous Agents from Scientific Navigation to Information Integration
arXiv · Jul 24, 2026
LitCurate: A Configuration-Driven AI-Assisted Framework for Scientific Database Construction with an Application to Lower-Mantle Equation-of-State Data
arXiv · Sep 1, 2026
Mined from Scientific Literature: Process Schemas for Atomic Layer Deposition and Etching in Materials Science
arXiv · Sep 14, 2026