Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Research

aiqbench analysis

This research investigates the transferability of Joint-Embedding Predictive Architecture (JEPA) models for CNC machine dynamics when sensor configurations differ between source and target systems. The study finds that while JEPA pretraining offers no immediate forecasting gain on clean data, specific schema-adaptive architectures can achieve zero-shot performance under partial sensor overlap, though they still lag behind specialized baselines like RevIN-equipped PatchTST. These findings highlight the critical challenge of evaluating industrial world models solely on source-domain accuracy without accounting for cross-machine adaptation constraints.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Schema-Adaptive Action-Conditioned JEPA for Cross-Machine CNC Transfer under Partial Sensor Overlap

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2609.16071v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Cross-machine deployment of industrial world models requires transfer across changes in dynamics, sensing interfaces, sampling regimes, and control units. We study a schema-adaptive action-conditioned Joint-Embedding Predictive Architecture (SAAC-JEPA) for CNC dynamics, where the source machine has 17 canonical sensor channels and the target shares only 10. Evaluation uses group-disjoint source splits, source-only normalization, held-out self-supervised validation, unit audits, and a sealed target test after model locking. Across five seeds, JEPA pretraining gives no clean-source forecasting gain: scratch and pretrained-body models obtain \(\mathrm{RMSE}=0.811\pm0.022\) and \(0.813\pm0.022\). A source-only search over 20 candidates selects a schema-consistent action-conditioned JEPA after seven-seed stability checks. On the confirmatory target pass, the locked model reaches zero-shot \(\mathrm{RMSE}=0.546\), \(R^2=0.012\), and \(\mathrm{NLL}=0.52\), outperforming persistence but not RevIN-equipped PatchTST and iTransformer baselines (\(0.503\) and \(0.498\)). A pre-declared paired ablation shows that RevIN in the same architecture improves RMSE to \(0.495\pm0.004\) over three seeds, but degrades target calibration (\(\mathrm{NLL}=20.6\)) on stationary context windows. A pre-lock adaptation sweep further reduces RMSE to \(0.520\) with limited target support. These results show that source-domain forecasting accuracy alone is insufficient to assess industrial predictive representations, and that cross-machine adaptation under partial sensor overlap is a distinct evaluation axis.

Abstract:Cross-machine deployment of industrial world models requires transfer across changes in dynamics, sensing interfaces, sampling regimes, and control units. We study a schema-adaptive action-conditioned Joint-Embedding Predictive Architecture (SAAC-JEPA) for CNC dynamics, where the source machine has 17 canonical sensor channels and the target shares only 10. Evaluation uses group-disjoint source splits, source-only normalization, held-out self-supervised validation, unit audits, and a sealed target test after model locking. Across five seeds, JEPA pretraining gives no clean-source forecasting gain: scratch and pretrained-body models obtain \(\mathrm{RMSE}=0.811\pm0.022\) and \(0.813\pm0.022\). A source-only search over 20 candidates selects a schema-consistent action-conditioned JEPA after seven-seed stability checks. On the confirmatory target pass, the locked model reaches zero-shot \(\mathrm{RMSE}=0.546\), \(R^2=0.012\), and \(\mathrm{NLL}=0.52\), outperforming persistence but not RevIN-equipped PatchTST and iTransformer baselines (\(0.503\) and \(0.498\)). A pre-declared paired ablation shows that RevIN in the same architecture improves RMSE to \(0.495\pm0.004\) over three seeds, but degrades target calibration (\(\mathrm{NLL}=20.6\)) on stationary context windows. A pre-lock adaptation sweep further reduces RMSE to \(0.520\) with limited target support. These results show that source-domain forecasting accuracy alone is insufficient to assess industrial predictive representations, and that cross-machine adaptation under partial sensor overlap is a distinct evaluation axis.

Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

arXiv:2609.16071 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2609.16071v1 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.16071 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 288 words

Related coverage