aiqbench analysis
ScAn-Bench addresses a critical gap in the machine learning field by providing the first systematic evaluation of scaling law methodologies across thousands of model checkpoints. This benchmark enables researchers to rigorously compare data acquisition and extrapolation techniques for both language and vision-language models, moving beyond anecdotal evidence toward standardized best practices. By clarifying how scaling prescriptions are derived, this work directly supports the optimization of future foundation model architectures and training strategies.
ScAn-Bench: Evaluating Scaling Analysis Methodology
arXiv:2609.35707v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Recent progress in machine learning is driven by large-scale foundation models, where scaling laws and finding optimal scaling prescriptions for architecture, data, and hyperparameters are key in advancing the state-of-the-art. Therefore, it is surprising that no systematic study evaluates the methodology to obtain scaling laws and prescriptions across different model types. To shed light on this crucial blind spot and facilitate future research, we introduce the surrogate benchmarks ScAn-Bench-LLM and ScAn-Bench-VLM based on 4524 and 8024 checkpoints of language and vision-language model pipelines. On our benchmarks, we perform the first systematic evaluation of both data acquisition and extrapolation methodology for scaling analysis across different data modalities.
Abstract:Recent progress in machine learning is driven by large-scale foundation models, where scaling laws and finding optimal scaling prescriptions for architecture, data, and hyperparameters are key in advancing the state-of-the-art. Therefore, it is surprising that no systematic study evaluates the methodology to obtain scaling laws and prescriptions across different model types. To shed light on this crucial blind spot and facilitate future research, we introduce the surrogate benchmarks ScAn-Bench-LLM and ScAn-Bench-VLM based on 4524 and 8024 checkpoints of language and vision-language model pipelines. On our benchmarks, we perform the first systematic evaluation of both data acquisition and extrapolation methodology for scaling analysis across different data modalities.
Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2609.35707 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2609.35707v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.35707 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 200 words
Related coverage

Brief independent investigation of agents’ behavior, reasoning and collaboration in the OpenAI / Hugging Face hacking incident
METR · Aug 26, 2026

Introducing Mistral Large 4
Mistral AI · Oct 6, 2026

[AINews] Meta Muse Wonder & Wonder Full: MSL’s Claude 5.5-tier Frontier Model
Latent Space · Oct 13, 2026

[AINews] not much happened today
Latent Space · Sep 18, 2026