Scaling Video Generation for Reasoning: At What Cost?

arXiv:2609.36599v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We study whether scaling video generation enables models to reason about hidden information from the past frames, and at what computational cost. Our controlled benchmark requires predicting nine prescribed moves of an initially solved 2x2x2 Rubik's Cube from a fixed view of three faces. Correct predictions require inferring how actions change hidden states, and the simulator provides exact ground truth for evaluation. Models learn plausible cube geometry early, while correct sticker configurations require substantially more training. Although validation MSE follows approximate power-law scaling, lower MSE loss does not reliably indicate downstream reasoning capabilities. Smaller autoregressive models achieve higher state accuracy with limited compute, while larger models reach higher accuracy after more training. At roughly 0.1 PF-days, the 70M-parameter model correctly predicts the visible sticker configuration in 44.6% of post-action frames, compared with 0.3% for the 1B model, which reaches 83.7% at 3.14 PF-days. Symbolic state supervision raises the 20M model's frame accuracy from 31.1% to 67.3% at the same training-data budget, suggesting that learning representations of state changes can complement scaling.

Title:Scaling Video Generation for Reasoning: At What Cost?

Abstract:We study whether scaling video generation enables models to reason about hidden information from the past frames, and at what computational cost. Our controlled benchmark requires predicting nine prescribed moves of an initially solved 2x2x2 Rubik's Cube from a fixed view of three faces. Correct predictions require inferring how actions change hidden states, and the simulator provides exact ground truth for evaluation. Models learn plausible cube geometry early, while correct sticker configurations require substantially more training. Although validation MSE follows approximate power-law scaling, lower MSE loss does not reliably indicate downstream reasoning capabilities. Smaller autoregressive models achieve higher state accuracy with limited compute, while larger models reach higher accuracy after more training. At roughly 0.1 PF-days, the 70M-parameter model correctly predicts the visible sticker configuration in 44.6% of post-action frames, compared with 0.3% for the 1B model, which reaches 83.7% at 3.14 PF-days. Symbolic state supervision raises the 20M model's frame accuracy from 31.1% to 67.3% at the same training-data budget, suggesting that learning representations of state changes can complement scaling.

Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Machine Learning (cs.LG)

arXiv:2609.36599 [cs.CV]

(or arXiv:2609.36599v1 [cs.CV] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.36599 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

aiqbench analysis

Scaling Video Generation for Reasoning: At What Cost?

Related coverage