Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Research

aiqbench analysis

This doctoral thesis proposes combining foundation models with symbolic planning so robots can ground language instructions, predict the effects of their actions, and keep their internal world models consistent with reality. The three systems it describes (LIMP, REALM, and PACTS) are research prototypes, and the abstract makes no claims about real-world benchmarks or deployment. For AI readers, the key question is whether these verification-oriented methods hold up beyond the assumptions the models rely on.
Sources coveringarXiv, Cybersecurity News

Scaling Trusted Autonomy: Towards Generally Capable Verifiable Robots

arXiv3 min read

arXiv:2611.00158v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Robots powered by foundation models are increasingly able to interpret open-ended language, recognize unfamiliar objects, and operate across diverse environments. Yet broader capability does not establish that a robot has understood a request, that its actions will produce the intended effects, or that its internal representation still corresponds to reality. Classical symbolic planning provides explicit structure for composition and verification, but traditionally depends on hand-engineered skills and representations. Learned policies can broaden the robot's repertoire, but provide weak guarantees about what will happen and why. This thesis argues that scaling trusted autonomy requires a neurosymbolic approach that unifies the generality of learned models with symbolic structure for robust robot behavior. It explores three complementary directions. First, LIMP uses foundation models and spatial reasoning to ground natural-language instructions in explicit task constraints and instruction-specific semantic maps, enabling task-and-motion planning while exposing the robot's interpretation for inspection. Second, REALM maintains an editable, photorealistic 3D Gaussian scene, predicts the consequences of planned manipulation, and locally reconciles the scene so that subsequent instructions obtain their grounding and planning geometry from an updated state. Third, PACTS learns visuomotor skills that jointly generate action trajectories and predictions of their symbolic effects, supporting skill composition, progress monitoring, and recovery through replanning. Together, these contributions preserve explicit structure for reasoning and verification while broadening how it is obtained, providing a foundation for generally capable robots whose behavior can be assessed under the assumptions of their models.

Abstract:Robots powered by foundation models are increasingly able to interpret open-ended language, recognize unfamiliar objects, and operate across diverse environments. Yet broader capability does not establish that a robot has understood a request, that its actions will produce the intended effects, or that its internal representation still corresponds to reality. Classical symbolic planning provides explicit structure for composition and verification, but traditionally depends on hand-engineered skills and representations. Learned policies can broaden the robot's repertoire, but provide weak guarantees about what will happen and why. This thesis argues that scaling trusted autonomy requires a neurosymbolic approach that unifies the generality of learned models with symbolic structure for robust robot behavior. It explores three complementary directions. First, LIMP uses foundation models and spatial reasoning to ground natural-language instructions in explicit task constraints and instruction-specific semantic maps, enabling task-and-motion planning while exposing the robot's interpretation for inspection. Second, REALM maintains an editable, photorealistic 3D Gaussian scene, predicts the consequences of planned manipulation, and locally reconciles the scene so that subsequent instructions obtain their grounding and planning geometry from an updated state. Third, PACTS learns visuomotor skills that jointly generate action trajectories and predictions of their symbolic effects, supporting skill composition, progress monitoring, and recovery through replanning. Together, these contributions preserve explicit structure for reasoning and verification while broadening how it is obtained, providing a foundation for generally capable robots whose behavior can be assessed under the assumptions of their models.

Robotics (cs.RO)

arXiv:2611.00158 [cs.RO]

(or arXiv:2611.00158v1 [cs.RO] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2611.00158 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 331 words

Related coverage