Skip to content
aiqbench takeQuantum Computing

aiqbench analysis

This research addresses a critical bottleneck in combinatorial optimization by developing a heuristic strategy to determine penalization weights for QUBO formulations, significantly improving solver efficacy on both classical annealers and trapped-ion quantum processors. By proving the NP-hardness of optimal weight selection and offering polynomial-time solutions, the work enhances the practical utility of hybrid classical-quantum solvers for constrained problems.
Source coveringarXiv

Scalable Determination of Penalization Weights for Constrained Optimizations on Approximate Solvers

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2604.02416v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Quadratic unconstrained binary optimization (QUBO) provides problem formulations for various computational problems that can be solved with dedicated QUBO solvers, based on classical or quantum computation. A common approach to constrained combinatorial optimization problems is to enforce the constraints in the QUBO formulation by adding penalization terms. Penalization introduces an additional hyperparameter that significantly affects the solver's efficacy: the relative weight between the objective terms and the penalization terms. Here we study the problem of a priori determining suitable penalization weights from a foundational and practical perspective. We formally establish that finding its optimal value for Gibbs solvers is $\mathsf{NP}$-hard even approximately and $\#\mathsf{P}$-hard exactly. This serves us as a motivation to develop a widely applicable heuristic strategy for determining suitable penalization weights, with provable guarantees for Gibbs solvers, and polynomial complexity for broad problem classes. Experiments across diverse problems and solver architectures, including large-scale instances on Fujitsu's Digital Annealer, show robust performance and order-of-magnitude speedups over existing heuristics. We further extend the strategy to quantum approximate optimization and demonstrate its performance on Quantinuum's H2-2 trapped-ion processor.

Abstract:Quadratic unconstrained binary optimization (QUBO) provides problem formulations for various computational problems that can be solved with dedicated QUBO solvers, based on classical or quantum computation. A common approach to constrained combinatorial optimization problems is to enforce the constraints in the QUBO formulation by adding penalization terms. Penalization introduces an additional hyperparameter that significantly affects the solver's efficacy: the relative weight between the objective terms and the penalization terms. Here we study the problem of a priori determining suitable penalization weights from a foundational and practical perspective. We formally establish that finding its optimal value for Gibbs solvers is $\mathsf{NP}$-hard even approximately and $\#\mathsf{P}$-hard exactly. This serves us as a motivation to develop a widely applicable heuristic strategy for determining suitable penalization weights, with provable guarantees for Gibbs solvers, and polynomial complexity for broad problem classes. Experiments across diverse problems and solver architectures, including large-scale instances on Fujitsu's Digital Annealer, show robust performance and order-of-magnitude speedups over existing heuristics. We further extend the strategy to quantum approximate optimization and demonstrate its performance on Quantinuum's H2-2 trapped-ion processor.

arXiv:2604.02416 [quant-ph]

(or arXiv:2604.02416v2 [quant-ph] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2604.02416 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 266 words

Related coverage