Skip to content
aiqbench takeQuantum Computing

aiqbench analysis

The paper analyzes how photon loss, mode mismatch, and input-state errors limit how large a boson sampling experiment can get before it becomes efficiently simulable classically. It also proposes two device-level metrics, a "score" for usable capacity and a "volume" for cross-platform comparison. For quantum computing readers, the practical takeaway is a more concrete way to judge whether photonic hardware is actually reaching the problem-size regime where advantage claims matter.
Sources coveringarXiv, Quantum Zeitgeist
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Scalability and performance metrics for boson sampling devices

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2610.14602v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Linear-optical platforms provide a promising route to demonstrate quantum computational advantage, particularly through the boson sampling problem. While a boson sampling system should be large enough to show the quantum advantage, the size of the boson sampling problem is often restricted by experimental constraints. In particular, as a boson sampling system is scaled up, experimental constraints can limit its effective problem size to permit efficient classical simulation. In this paper, we investigate the theoretical scalability bounds for boson sampling systems under practical experimental conditions, including photon loss, mode mismatch, and input state error. We employ non-negativity conditions for phase-space quasiprobability distribution functions to analyze these effects. In addition, we introduce two device-level metrics, the boson sampling score which measures the usable capacity of a given device and the boson sampling volume which provides a common hardware-level benchmark for comparing different platforms and assessing their access to an advantage-relevant problem size regime. Our results provide fundamental insights into the performance of boson sampling systems under realistic experimental conditions and offer practical guidelines for scaling up boson sampling systems.

Abstract:Linear-optical platforms provide a promising route to demonstrate quantum computational advantage, particularly through the boson sampling problem. While a boson sampling system should be large enough to show the quantum advantage, the size of the boson sampling problem is often restricted by experimental constraints. In particular, as a boson sampling system is scaled up, experimental constraints can limit its effective problem size to permit efficient classical simulation. In this paper, we investigate the theoretical scalability bounds for boson sampling systems under practical experimental conditions, including photon loss, mode mismatch, and input state error. We employ non-negativity conditions for phase-space quasiprobability distribution functions to analyze these effects. In addition, we introduce two device-level metrics, the boson sampling score which measures the usable capacity of a given device and the boson sampling volume which provides a common hardware-level benchmark for comparing different platforms and assessing their access to an advantage-relevant problem size regime. Our results provide fundamental insights into the performance of boson sampling systems under realistic experimental conditions and offer practical guidelines for scaling up boson sampling systems.

arXiv:2610.14602 [quant-ph]

(or arXiv:2610.14602v1 [quant-ph] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.14602 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 268 words

Related coverage