aiqbench analysis
This research audit reveals that expanding candidate pools in video world models often yields "sampling headroom" that current selection policies cannot reliably convert into better outputs, wasting significant compute resources. The study demonstrates that without robust mechanisms to identify superior rollouts within a wider sample, adaptive strategies fail to recover even a fraction of the potential quality gains offered by uniform sampling. These findings are critical for optimizing inference costs in generative video systems where test-time scaling is currently being aggressively pursued.
Sampling headroom is not selection gain: a compute-value audit of test-time scaling for video world models
arXiv:2609.13257v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Test-time scaling (TTS) can improve generation only when additional compute produces better candidates and the system can reliably identify them. This distinction is especially important for video world models, where a wider sample pool may contain stronger rollouts without improving the output that is ultimately selected. We introduce the Compute-Value Audit (CVA), a sequential framework that asks whether extra sampling creates opportunity, observable signals provide a reliable state, that state supports a beneficial action, and the resulting gain exceeds the full entry fee of generation and verification. On 192 Physics-IQ scenes, expanding the pool from 4 to 16 candidates increases oracle quality by +9.23 IQ (95% CI [+7.44, +11.14]), but Flow, Cycle, and VideoReward fail to recover this headroom reliably. Across three generators, none of twelve adaptive-depth policies outperforms uniform compute; they recover only 42-69% of the measured entry fee. A matched-60-NFE Predict-and-Perturb intervention on VideoPhy2 is likewise negative across three fresh-seed replicas. These negative results are not universal: anchor-explorer passes all four stages in a sparse PRM800K setting, MMLU-Pro exposes the gap between predictive state and useful action, and a privileged paired future establishes a positive video upper bound. Together, these results show that sampling headroom has deployment value only when it can be converted into a reliable decision whose benefit survives the complete compute charge. Code is available at https://github.com/YuhuaJiang2002/sampling-headroom-is-not-selection-gain.
Abstract:Test-time scaling (TTS) can improve generation only when additional compute produces better candidates and the system can reliably identify them. This distinction is especially important for video world models, where a wider sample pool may contain stronger rollouts without improving the output that is ultimately selected. We introduce the Compute-Value Audit (CVA), a sequential framework that asks whether extra sampling creates opportunity, observable signals provide a reliable state, that state supports a beneficial action, and the resulting gain exceeds the full entry fee of generation and verification. On 192 Physics-IQ scenes, expanding the pool from 4 to 16 candidates increases oracle quality by +9.23 IQ (95% CI [+7.44, +11.14]), but Flow, Cycle, and VideoReward fail to recover this headroom reliably. Across three generators, none of twelve adaptive-depth policies outperforms uniform compute; they recover only 42-69% of the measured entry fee. A matched-60-NFE Predict-and-Perturb intervention on VideoPhy2 is likewise negative across three fresh-seed replicas. These negative results are not universal: anchor-explorer passes all four stages in a sparse PRM800K setting, MMLU-Pro exposes the gap between predictive state and useful action, and a privileged paired future establishes a positive video upper bound. Together, these results show that sampling headroom has deployment value only when it can be converted into a reliable decision whose benefit survives the complete compute charge. Code is available at this https URL.
Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2609.13257 [cs.CV]
(or arXiv:2609.13257v1 [cs.CV] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.13257 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 324 words
Related coverage

[AINews] not much happened today
Latent Space · Oct 3, 2026

Projection sampling preserves capabilities but diminishes gains from alignment fine-tuning
LessWrong · Oct 16, 2026

[AINews] Meta Muse Wonder & Wonder Full: MSL’s Claude 5.5-tier Frontier Model
Latent Space · Oct 13, 2026

Concrete Evaluations to Investigate the OpenAI Model That Hacked Hugging Face
AI Alignment Forum · Aug 3, 2026