Skip to content
aiqbench takeMachine Learning

aiqbench analysis

This research presents a novel framework for correcting biased sequential samplers to achieve exact Gibbs distributions using path-space relative-entropy projections and Doob transforms. By introducing Local-Boltzmann guidance, the study demonstrates that prefix-dependent autoregressive priors significantly outperform standard singleton-product approaches in maintaining effective sample sizes on discrete graphical models like Ising grids. The work advances theoretical understanding of finite-budget sampling strategies while offering practical algorithms for improving inference accuracy without increasing computational horizons.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Sampling Decisions: Exact Path-Space Correction, Prior Cancellation and Local-Boltzmann Guidance

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2503.14549v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: How can a cheap but biased sequential, finite-horizon sampler over a discrete space be corrected so that its terminal output follows a prescribed Gibbs distribution? We formulate Sampling Decisions as a path-space relative-entropy projection on a growing autoregressive state graph. The unique prior-relative minimizer is a Doob transform governed by a linear backward recursion. A route-resolved formulation then yields a finite-particle algorithm based on conditional self-normalized importance sampling, and we prove convergence of its transition kernels and terminal law as the path budget grows. For binary graphical models, we prove an exact cancellation theorem: all fixed singleton-product priors disappear from the population correction; only the ordering policy survives. Thus, more accurate one-point marginals may not produce a better finite-budget sampler. We therefore introduce a prefix-dependent autoregressive Local-Boltzmann prior that conditions each new spin on its revealed neighbors, while the path-space correction supplies the missing look-ahead field generated by the unrevealed subgraph. Experiments on 3*3, 4*4, and 5*5 Ising grids show that singleton-product priors suffer severe importance-weight degeneracy, whereas Local-Boltzmann guidance maintains substantially larger effective sample size and reaches the exact-target reference band at the tested budgets. The results identify correlated, prefix-dependent guidance as the decisive ingredient in sequential sampling.

Abstract:How can a cheap but biased sequential, finite-horizon sampler over a discrete space be corrected so that its terminal output follows a prescribed Gibbs distribution? We formulate Sampling Decisions as a path-space relative-entropy projection on a growing autoregressive state graph. The unique prior-relative minimizer is a Doob transform governed by a linear backward recursion. A route-resolved formulation then yields a finite-particle algorithm based on conditional self-normalized importance sampling, and we prove convergence of its transition kernels and terminal law as the path budget grows. For binary graphical models, we prove an exact cancellation theorem: all fixed singleton-product priors disappear from the population correction; only the ordering policy survives. Thus, more accurate one-point marginals may not produce a better finite-budget sampler. We therefore introduce a prefix-dependent autoregressive Local-Boltzmann prior that conditions each new spin on its revealed neighbors, while the path-space correction supplies the missing look-ahead field generated by the unrevealed subgraph. Experiments on 3*3, 4*4, and 5*5 Ising grids show that singleton-product priors suffer severe importance-weight degeneracy, whereas Local-Boltzmann guidance maintains substantially larger effective sample size and reaches the exact-target reference band at the tested budgets. The results identify correlated, prefix-dependent guidance as the decisive ingredient in sequential sampling.

Machine Learning (cs.LG); Statistical Mechanics (cond-mat.stat-mech); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Systems and Control (eess.SY); Machine Learning (stat.ML)

arXiv:2503.14549 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2503.14549v3 [cs.LG] for this version)

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 223 words

Related coverage