Same Flow, Different Paths: Variance Reduction in Flow Matching

arXiv:2609.17287v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: In flow matching (FM), a velocity model $v_{\theta}$ is trained using a predefined path $g_t$ that connects data and noise samples (e.g., $g_t(x_0, x_1) = (1 - t) x_0 + t x_1$). In this work, we study the choice of this path from an optimization perspective by analyzing the variance of stochastic gradients. We consider the class $G(p_t,v^\star_t)$ of paths that induce the same marginal distributions $p_t$ and marginal velocity field $v^\star_t$, and therefore the same FM objective. Our main finding is that the choice of path $g_t$ can fundamentally change the convergence rate of SGD, even when the FM objective remains exactly the same. (i) For a linear velocity model and one-dimensional Gaussian data, we derive a tight bound on the SGD iteration complexity up to logarithmic factors and find an analytically optimal path that minimizes this bound among linear paths inducing the same FM problem. (ii) We then extend the variance analysis to general FM problems and formulate path selection at a fixed $\theta$ as the variance-minimization problem PathOpt$_\theta$, constrained to $g_t\in G(p_t,v^\star_t)$. We show that this constraint is essential: reducing variance without it can lead to slower convergence. (iii) Since the constraint $g_t \in G(p_t,v^\star_t)$ cannot generally be verified directly, we derive an equivalent formulation with constraints that can be estimated from samples, allowing paths to be found numerically. Our theoretical results are supported by experiments with Gaussian data, Gaussian mixture models, and real datasets.

Abstract:In flow matching (FM), a velocity model $v_{\theta}$ is trained using a predefined path $g_t$ that connects data and noise samples (e.g., $g_t(x_0, x_1) = (1 - t) x_0 + t x_1$). In this work, we study the choice of this path from an optimization perspective by analyzing the variance of stochastic gradients. We consider the class $G(p_t,v^\star_t)$ of paths that induce the same marginal distributions $p_t$ and marginal velocity field $v^\star_t$, and therefore the same FM objective. Our main finding is that the choice of path $g_t$ can fundamentally change the convergence rate of SGD, even when the FM objective remains exactly the same. (i) For a linear velocity model and one-dimensional Gaussian data, we derive a tight bound on the SGD iteration complexity up to logarithmic factors and find an analytically optimal path that minimizes this bound among linear paths inducing the same FM problem. (ii) We then extend the variance analysis to general FM problems and formulate path selection at a fixed $\theta$ as the variance-minimization problem PathOpt$_\theta$, constrained to $g_t\in G(p_t,v^\star_t)$. We show that this constraint is essential: reducing variance without it can lead to slower convergence. (iii) Since the constraint $g_t \in G(p_t,v^\star_t)$ cannot generally be verified directly, we derive an equivalent formulation with constraints that can be estimated from samples, allowing paths to be found numerically. Our theoretical results are supported by experiments with Gaussian data, Gaussian mixture models, and real datasets.

Machine Learning (cs.LG); Optimization and Control (math.OC)

arXiv:2609.17287 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2609.17287v1 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.17287 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

aiqbench analysis

Same Flow, Different Paths: Variance Reduction in Flow Matching

Related coverage