Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Research

aiqbench analysis

SALUS addresses a critical integrity issue in the data analysis field by automatically detecting massive annotation errors (up to 37%) in widely used NL-to-SQL benchmarks. By leveraging multi-agent weak supervision, this system recalibrates evaluation metrics without relying on scarce human ground truth, ensuring that reported state-of-the-art performance reflects genuine model capability rather than dataset noise.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

SALUS: Automated Auditing of NL-to-SQL Benchmarks through Weak Supervision of Multi-Agent Output

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2610.05540v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Natural language to SQL (NL-to-SQL) benchmarks are foundational to progress in data analysis research, yet recent work has shown that widely-used benchmarks contain significant annotation errors. These errors silently corrupt evaluation metrics, penalize correct model output, and distort the field's understanding of state-of-the-art performance. We present SALUS, a system that automatically detects annotation errors in NL-to-SQL benchmarks. SALUS frames benchmark auditing as a weakly supervised error detection: SQL generated by multiple LLM agents drive a suite of complementary weak-labeling functions. By passing this noisy vote matrix through a generative label model, we extract high-confidence training samples without requiring human ground truth. These samples train a decision plane that maps gold SQL query features to per-agent trustworthiness, allowing SALUS to intelligently fuse reliability estimates with raw verdicts for rigorous benchmark error detection. We evaluate on BIRD-Clean-xs, a benchmark of 298 BIRD development tasks with manually verified correctness labels. SALUS achieves F1 = 0.9194, significantly outperforming the state-of-the-art baselines. Applying SALUS to the full development sets, we estimate annotation error rates of approximately 37% on BIRD and 27% on Spider.

Abstract:Natural language to SQL (NL-to-SQL) benchmarks are foundational to progress in data analysis research, yet recent work has shown that widely-used benchmarks contain significant annotation errors. These errors silently corrupt evaluation metrics, penalize correct model output, and distort the field's understanding of state-of-the-art performance. We present SALUS, a system that automatically detects annotation errors in NL-to-SQL benchmarks. SALUS frames benchmark auditing as a weakly supervised error detection: SQL generated by multiple LLM agents drive a suite of complementary weak-labeling functions. By passing this noisy vote matrix through a generative label model, we extract high-confidence training samples without requiring human ground truth. These samples train a decision plane that maps gold SQL query features to per-agent trustworthiness, allowing SALUS to intelligently fuse reliability estimates with raw verdicts for rigorous benchmark error detection. We evaluate on BIRD-Clean-xs, a benchmark of 298 BIRD development tasks with manually verified correctness labels. SALUS achieves F1 = 0.9194, significantly outperforming the state-of-the-art baselines. Applying SALUS to the full development sets, we estimate annotation error rates of approximately 37% on BIRD and 27% on Spider.

Extended version of the paper accepted at ACM SIGMOD 2027. Includes additional appendix material. 27 pages. 4 figures

Databases (cs.DB); Computation and Language (cs.CL); Machine Learning (cs.LG)

arXiv:2610.05540 [cs.DB]

(or arXiv:2610.05540v1 [cs.DB] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.05540 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

https://doi.org/10.1145/3856369 Focus to learn more DOI(s) linking to related resources

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 306 words

Related coverage