aiqbench analysis
This research introduces RSPO, a novel framework for regularized self-play policy optimization that addresses critical over-optimization issues in large language model alignment. By unifying prior methods and ensuring convergence to Nash equilibrium, the approach delivers measurable improvements in win rates and response diversity across multiple base models. The work provides a robust theoretical foundation for advancing self-play techniques in preference optimization without relying on external reward models.
RSPO: Regularized Self-Play Alignment of Large Language Models
arXiv:2503.00030v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Self-play-based policy optimization has emerged as an effective approach for fine-tuning large language models (LLMs), formulating preference optimization as a two-player game. However, the regularization with respect to the reference policy, which is crucial for mitigating over-optimization, has been insufficiently investigated in self-play alignment. To study the impact of different regularization strategies, we propose Regularized Self-Play Policy Optimization (RSPO), a novel framework that unifies prior methods and enables simple plug-and-play regularizers, meanwhile preserving convergence to Nash equilibrium of the corresponding regularized game. We empirically show that RSPO with appropriate regularizers can substantially improve the length-controlled win rate (LCWR) on AlpacaEval-2 across a range of base models, while also achieving consistently superior performance on Arena-Hard, MT-Bench, ArmoRM, and response diversity. In particular, RSPO improves unregularized self-play baseline (SPPO) on AlpacaEval-2 LCWR from $28.5\%$ to $ 35.4\%$ with base model Mistral-7B, from $38.77\%$ to $43.66\%$ with LLaMA-8B, and from $50.54\%$ to $51.83\%$ with Gemma-2B. Combining simplicity, convergence guarantees, and significant empirical gains, RSPO offers a strong foundation for exploring regularized self-play in alignment. Code is available at https://github.com/xiaohangt/RSPO
Abstract:Self-play-based policy optimization has emerged as an effective approach for fine-tuning large language models (LLMs), formulating preference optimization as a two-player game. However, the regularization with respect to the reference policy, which is crucial for mitigating over-optimization, has been insufficiently investigated in self-play alignment. To study the impact of different regularization strategies, we propose Regularized Self-Play Policy Optimization (RSPO), a novel framework that unifies prior methods and enables simple plug-and-play regularizers, meanwhile preserving convergence to Nash equilibrium of the corresponding regularized game. We empirically show that RSPO with appropriate regularizers can substantially improve the length-controlled win rate (LCWR) on AlpacaEval-2 across a range of base models, while also achieving consistently superior performance on Arena-Hard, MT-Bench, ArmoRM, and response diversity. In particular, RSPO improves unregularized self-play baseline (SPPO) on AlpacaEval-2 LCWR from $28.5\%$ to $ 35.4\%$ with base model Mistral-7B, from $38.77\%$ to $43.66\%$ with LLaMA-8B, and from $50.54\%$ to $51.83\%$ with Gemma-2B. Combining simplicity, convergence guarantees, and significant empirical gains, RSPO offers a strong foundation for exploring regularized self-play in alignment. Code is available at this https URL
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2503.00030 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2503.00030v3 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2503.00030 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 273 words
Related coverage

Game-Theoretic Disempowerment: Loss of Control to Agencyless AI
LessWrong · Sep 27, 2026
Your Self-Play Algorithm is Secretly an Adversarial Imitator: Understanding LLM Self-Play through the Lens of Imitation Learning
arXiv · Jun 9, 2026

Digital States 2026: AI Moves From Experiment to Infrastructure
govtech.com · Sep 24, 2026

Concrete Evaluations to Investigate the OpenAI Model That Hacked Hugging Face
AI Alignment Forum · Aug 3, 2026