Skip to content
aiqbench takeMachine Learning

aiqbench analysis

This research addresses the critical bottleneck of integrating generative reward models into reinforcement learning by resolving the mismatch between comparative ranking outputs and scalar scoring requirements. The proposed Ranking-based Reward Construction (RRC) framework leverages self-competitive and anchor-guided strategies to generate more effective training signals, yielding consistent performance gains on chat and reasoning benchmarks. This methodological advance significantly enhances the scalability of RL workflows using next-token prediction models for reward generation.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

RRC: Unlocking Generative Reward Models in LLM Reinforcement Learning via Ranking-Based Reward Construction

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2608.06310v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Recent advances in reward modeling show a paradigm shift from discriminative reward models to generative reward models. However, despite their strong capabilities in response ranking, generative reward models have not realized their potential in reinforcement learning (RL). Our analysis reveals that this limitation arises from a mismatch between the comparative nature of generative reward modeling and the scalar scoring paradigm adopted by existing RL algorithms. To bridge this gap, we propose a Ranking-based Reward Construction (RRC) approach, which enables generative reward models to provide more effective RL learning signals by deriving rewards from relative preference rankings. RRC introduces two complementary strategies: self-competitive ranking, which exploits comparisons among sampled responses, and anchor-guided ranking, which enables scalable ranking-based reward construction with a small set of reference responses. Experiments across open-ended chat and reasoning benchmarks demonstrate that RRC substantially improves RL training with generative reward models, achieving consistent gains over existing reward construction approaches. Our code can be found at https://github.com/wangclnlp/RRC.

Abstract:Recent advances in reward modeling show a paradigm shift from discriminative reward models to generative reward models. However, despite their strong capabilities in response ranking, generative reward models have not realized their potential in reinforcement learning (RL). Our analysis reveals that this limitation arises from a mismatch between the comparative nature of generative reward modeling and the scalar scoring paradigm adopted by existing RL algorithms. To bridge this gap, we propose a Ranking-based Reward Construction (RRC) approach, which enables generative reward models to provide more effective RL learning signals by deriving rewards from relative preference rankings. RRC introduces two complementary strategies: self-competitive ranking, which exploits comparisons among sampled responses, and anchor-guided ranking, which enables scalable ranking-based reward construction with a small set of reference responses. Experiments across open-ended chat and reasoning benchmarks demonstrate that RRC substantially improves RL training with generative reward models, achieving consistent gains over existing reward construction approaches. Our code can be found at this https URL.

Machine Learning (cs.LG); Computation and Language (cs.CL)

arXiv:2608.06310 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2608.06310v1 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.06310 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 258 words

Related coverage