Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Research

aiqbench analysis

This research introduces ROI-Reasoning, a framework that equips large language models with meta-cognitive abilities to strategically allocate computation under strict token budgets. By treating inference as an optimization problem similar to the Ordered Stochastic Multiple-Choice Knapsack Problem, the method significantly improves performance in mathematical reasoning and code generation while reducing wasted resources on low-value tasks. This approach addresses a critical efficiency bottleneck in deploying LLMs for complex, multi-step problems where computational constraints are tight.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

ROI-Reasoning: Rational Optimization for Inference via Pre-Computation Meta-Cognition

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2601.03822v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) can achieve strong reasoning performance with sufficient computation, but they do not inherently know how much computation a task requires. We study budgeted inference-time reasoning for multiple problems under a strict global token constraint and formulate it as an Ordered Stochastic Multiple-Choice Knapsack Problem (OS-MCKP). This perspective highlights a meta-cognitive requirement---anticipating problem difficulty and allocating computation strategically. We propose ROI-Reasoning, a two-stage framework that endows LLMs with intrinsic, budget-aware rationality. First, Meta-Cognitive Fine-Tuning teaches models to predict reasoning cost levels and decide whether a problem is worth attempting before generation. Next, Rationality-Aware Reinforcement Learning optimizes sequential decision making under a hard token budget, allowing models to learn long-horizon allocation strategies. Experiments across mathematical reasoning, multiple-choice question answering, and code generation show that ROI-Reasoning improves scores and generally reduces reference-order regret under tight budgets, with up to a \textbf{417\%} relative score improvement over the strongest same-backbone baseline in mathematics.

Abstract:Large language models (LLMs) can achieve strong reasoning performance with sufficient computation, but they do not inherently know how much computation a task requires. We study budgeted inference-time reasoning for multiple problems under a strict global token constraint and formulate it as an Ordered Stochastic Multiple-Choice Knapsack Problem (OS-MCKP). This perspective highlights a meta-cognitive requirement---anticipating problem difficulty and allocating computation strategically. We propose ROI-Reasoning, a two-stage framework that endows LLMs with intrinsic, budget-aware rationality. First, Meta-Cognitive Fine-Tuning teaches models to predict reasoning cost levels and decide whether a problem is worth attempting before generation. Next, Rationality-Aware Reinforcement Learning optimizes sequential decision making under a hard token budget, allowing models to learn long-horizon allocation strategies. Experiments across mathematical reasoning, multiple-choice question answering, and code generation show that ROI-Reasoning improves scores and generally reduces reference-order regret under tight budgets, with up to a \textbf{417\%} relative score improvement over the strongest same-backbone baseline in mathematics.

Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

arXiv:2601.03822 [cs.AI]

(or arXiv:2601.03822v2 [cs.AI] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2601.03822 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 244 words

Related coverage