aiqbench analysis
This paper uses game theory to model how introducing a single, highly versatile disruptive technology affects competitive dynamics, finding that such advantages are often limited and rarely exploited in practice. The study highlights non-intuitive pitfalls for developers, suggesting that mere capability does not guarantee strategic value when expanding existing technological ecosystems.
Rock, Paper, Scissors, ... Dynamite - A Model of Disruption from New Technologies
arXiv:2609.00207v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We seek to understand the effect of adding disruptive highly-capable new technologies to competitions by assessing the addition of Dynamite to Rock-Paper-Scissors. We find that providing a versatile Dynamite move to only one player provides limited value (win probability increases from 50% to 55.5%) and is played rarely. That value decreases further if the game is expanded beyond just the original three moves. We also observe several mechanisms by which prior moves can become strategically unplayable, or obsolete. We hope that this model illustrates some non-intuitive aspects of developing new versatile technologies. We also hope that it illustrates some pitfalls for developers and integrators to avoid in order to create value rather than merely capability.
Title:Rock, Paper, Scissors, ... Dynamite - A Model of Disruption from New Technologies
Abstract:We seek to understand the effect of adding disruptive highly-capable new technologies to competitions by assessing the addition of Dynamite to Rock-Paper-Scissors. We find that providing a versatile Dynamite move to only one player provides limited value (win probability increases from 50% to 55.5%) and is played rarely. That value decreases further if the game is expanded beyond just the original three moves. We also observe several mechanisms by which prior moves can become strategically unplayable, or obsolete. We hope that this model illustrates some non-intuitive aspects of developing new versatile technologies. We also hope that it illustrates some pitfalls for developers and integrators to avoid in order to create value rather than merely capability.
Physics and Society (physics.soc-ph); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Emerging Technologies (cs.ET); Computer Science and Game Theory (cs.GT)
arXiv:2609.00207 [physics.soc-ph]
(or arXiv:2609.00207v1 [physics.soc-ph] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.00207 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 235 words
Related coverage
Does preservation make sense before we know how to revive?
LessWrong · Jun 15, 2026

New experts join Google’s AI & Economy team
Google · Sep 18, 2026

Weekly Cyber Security Newsletter Bulletin – Entra ID RCE, Claude Code Ransomware, T-Mobile Cable, Azure Credential Theft +20 Stories
Cybersecurity News · Aug 23, 2026

Tech Hits a Wall & Netflix Plunges | The Motley Fool
fool.com · Jul 25, 2026