aiqbench analysis
This research exposes a critical safety gap in Vision-Language Models where alignment strategies focused on holistic images fail to detect harmful semantics distributed across split-image fragments. The authors demonstrate that adversarial knowledge distillation significantly improves cross-model transferability for these split-image jailbreak attacks, achieving up to 44% higher success rates than existing baselines. These findings highlight the urgent need to expand safety alignment protocols to account for fragmented input modalities in next-generation VLMs.
Robustness of Vision Language Models Against Split-Image Harmful Input Attacks
arXiv:2602.08136v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Vision-Language Models (VLMs) are now a core part of modern AI. Recent work proposed several visual jailbreak attacks using single/ holistic images. However, contemporary VLMs demonstrate strong robustness against such attacks due to extensive safety alignment through preference optimization, e.g., reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF). In this work, we identify a new vulnerability: while VLM pretraining and instruction tuning generalize well to split-image inputs, safety alignment is typically performed only on holistic images and does not account for harmful semantics distributed across multiple image fragments. Consequently, VLMs often fail to detect and reject harmful split-image inputs, in which unsafe cues emerge only upon combining images. We introduce novel split-image visual jailbreak attacks (\textbf{SIVA}) that exploit this misalignment. Unlike prior optimization-based attacks, which exhibit poor black-box transferability due to architectural and prior mismatches across models, our attacks evolve in progressive phases from naive splitting to an adaptive white-box attack, culminating in a black-box transfer attack. Our strongest strategy leverages a novel adversarial knowledge distillation \textbf{(Adv-KD)} algorithm to substantially improve cross-model transferability. Evaluations on four state-of-the-art modern VLMs and three jailbreak datasets demonstrate that our strongest attack achieves up to 44% higher transfer success than existing baselines. Lastly, we propose efficient ways to address this critical vulnerability in the current VLM safety alignment.
Abstract:Vision-Language Models (VLMs) are now a core part of modern AI. Recent work proposed several visual jailbreak attacks using single/ holistic images. However, contemporary VLMs demonstrate strong robustness against such attacks due to extensive safety alignment through preference optimization, e.g., reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF). In this work, we identify a new vulnerability: while VLM pretraining and instruction tuning generalize well to split-image inputs, safety alignment is typically performed only on holistic images and does not account for harmful semantics distributed across multiple image fragments. Consequently, VLMs often fail to detect and reject harmful split-image inputs, in which unsafe cues emerge only upon combining images. We introduce novel split-image visual jailbreak attacks (\textbf{SIVA}) that exploit this misalignment. Unlike prior optimization-based attacks, which exhibit poor black-box transferability due to architectural and prior mismatches across models, our attacks evolve in progressive phases from naive splitting to an adaptive white-box attack, culminating in a black-box transfer attack. Our strongest strategy leverages a novel adversarial knowledge distillation \textbf{(Adv-KD)} algorithm to substantially improve cross-model transferability. Evaluations on four state-of-the-art modern VLMs and three jailbreak datasets demonstrate that our strongest attack achieves up to 44% higher transfer success than existing baselines. Lastly, we propose efficient ways to address this critical vulnerability in the current VLM safety alignment.
Accepted in ACM CCS 2026. 26 Pages, long conference paper
Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2602.08136 [cs.CV]
(or arXiv:2602.08136v2 [cs.CV] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2602.08136 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 320 words
Related coverage

[AINews] not much happened today
Latent Space · Sep 10, 2026

[AINews] not much happened today
Latent Space · Sep 18, 2026
Answer It or Not? Towards Prompt-Adapted Adversarial Images on Vision Language Models
arXiv · Oct 15, 2026
Exploring Adversarial Robustness and Safety Alignment in Multilingual Multi-Modal Large Language Models
arXiv · Jun 3, 2026