aiqbench analysis
This research advances quantum signal processing by introducing a resource-aware polynomial design that significantly reduces T-gate counts while managing error propagation in fault-tolerant implementations. By deriving classical algorithms to bound the operator-Lipschitz constant, the study offers a practical method for optimizing quantum resource costs without sacrificing accuracy in tasks like molecular Hamiltonian estimation.
Robustness of Quantum Signal Processing and Resource-aware Polynomial Design
arXiv:2610.03885v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Quantum signal processing (QSP) realizes operator functions through polynomial transformations of a finite degree. In addition to function approximation errors, realistic implementations incur algorithmic errors also when encoding the input operator and in synthesizing gates into a discrete fault-tolerant gate set. We provide an end-to-end analysis of these errors and show that the input error propagation is governed by the operator-Lipschitz constant $L_\star$ of the implemented function. We then derive an efficient classical algorithm to compute tight lower and upper bounds on $L_\star$, and we show that these bounds induce in turn lower and upper bounds on the total quantum-resource cost (for instance, $T$-gate count) needed for QSP implementations compatible with a target total error. We further devise a procedure to search for a polynomial with minimum cost based solely on its coefficients, yielding a resource-aware polynomial-design procedure for QSP. We illustrate the resulting method for ground state energy estimation via eigenvalue thresholding for the H$_6$ molecular Hamiltonian. In the tested hardware profiles, the resource-aware family improves the total-error budget and reduces the modeled $T$-gate count by $51.9\%$--$56.7\%$ relative to the standard analytical polynomial obtained from an error-function approximation.
Abstract:Quantum signal processing (QSP) realizes operator functions through polynomial transformations of a finite degree. In addition to function approximation errors, realistic implementations incur algorithmic errors also when encoding the input operator and in synthesizing gates into a discrete fault-tolerant gate set. We provide an end-to-end analysis of these errors and show that the input error propagation is governed by the operator-Lipschitz constant $L_\star$ of the implemented function. We then derive an efficient classical algorithm to compute tight lower and upper bounds on $L_\star$, and we show that these bounds induce in turn lower and upper bounds on the total quantum-resource cost (for instance, $T$-gate count) needed for QSP implementations compatible with a target total error. We further devise a procedure to search for a polynomial with minimum cost based solely on its coefficients, yielding a resource-aware polynomial-design procedure for QSP. We illustrate the resulting method for ground state energy estimation via eigenvalue thresholding for the H$_6$ molecular Hamiltonian. In the tested hardware profiles, the resource-aware family improves the total-error budget and reduces the modeled $T$-gate count by $51.9\%$--$56.7\%$ relative to the standard analytical polynomial obtained from an error-function approximation.
arXiv:2610.03885 [quant-ph]
(or arXiv:2610.03885v1 [quant-ph] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.03885 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 280 words
Related coverage

A new pulse design cuts errors in hybrid qubit-oscillator control
Quantum Zeitgeist · Oct 15, 2026

Digital States 2026: AI Moves From Experiment to Infrastructure
govtech.com · Sep 24, 2026

News
Quantum Computing Report · Jul 25, 2026

News
Quantum Computing Report · Jun 7, 2026