Skip to content
aiqbench takeQuantum Computing

aiqbench analysis

This research presents a rigorous self-testing protocol for two-qubit entangled states that eliminates the need for idealized projective measurement assumptions, addressing critical gaps in certifying real-world quantum hardware. By deriving an analytic robustness bound for non-unitary observables, the study reveals that practical device-independent certification is significantly more stringent than previously modeled by standard theoretical frameworks.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Robust self-test of the maximally entangled state of two-qubits without assuming unitary observables

arXiv1 min read

arXiv:2607.04035v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Standard device-independent self-testing uses Naimark dilation to assume projective measurements, masking the operational limitations of realistic non-unitary observables. We establish a robust pure self-test for the singlet and Pauli observables that entirely circumvents dilation of the measurement apparatus. Assuming a pure state to model an untrusted source, we regularize the physical non-projective operators and derive an analytic $\mathcal{O}(\sqrt{\epsilon})$ robustness bound. Our results suggest that device-independent certification of real implementations is significantly more demanding than standard projective models imply.

Abstract:Standard device-independent self-testing uses Naimark dilation to assume projective measurements, masking the operational limitations of realistic non-unitary observables. We establish a robust pure self-test for the singlet and Pauli observables that entirely circumvents dilation of the measurement apparatus. Assuming a pure state to model an untrusted source, we regularize the physical non-projective operators and derive an analytic $\mathcal{O}(\sqrt{\epsilon})$ robustness bound. Our results suggest that device-independent certification of real implementations is significantly more demanding than standard projective models imply.

5 pages + supplemental material. New version with corrected Eq. (13). Final result remains unaltered

arXiv:2607.04035 [quant-ph]

(or arXiv:2607.04035v2 [quant-ph] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.04035 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 182 words

Related coverage