aiqbench analysis
This paper introduces Robust Conformalized Selection, a new framework designed to maintain valid false discovery rate control when calibration data contains label noise. By reframing the problem as a localized covariate shift issue, it offers significant improvements over existing methods that assume clean responses in tasks like reliable labeling and LLM alignment. The approach provides theoretical guarantees for asymptotic FDR control while demonstrating robustness across simulated and real-world datasets.
Robust Conformalized Selection with Noisy Responses
arXiv:2607.22985v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Conformalized selection has been widely applied to select high-quality candidates from large datasets with rigorous uncertainty quantification, such as reliable labeling, drug discovery, and the alignment of large language models. Nevertheless, existing methods assume clean responses on calibration data, an assumption that rarely holds in practice. In this paper, we formulate the above tasks as selecting candidates with true predicted labels or with responses exceeding certain values. We demonstrate that existing conformal selection methods fail to control the false discovery rate (FDR) or suffer from severe power loss under contaminated calibration data. To that end, we propose Robust Conformalized Selection (RCS), a unified framework for selective classification with valid FDR control under general label contamination. The key insight of RCS lies in a novel statistical reduction: by separately conditioning on different classes, we translate the intractable label noise into a localized covariate shift problem, which then enables a covariate-adjusted empirical-Bayes-type estimate of the number of false selections. Statistical properties such as the asymptotic FDR control, power optimality, and robustness of RCS are established. We further develop an instantiation of RCS under randomized response model, and also apply RCS to the task of selecting candidates with large response values. Extensive experiments on both simulated and real-world datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of RCS.
Abstract:Conformalized selection has been widely applied to select high-quality candidates from large datasets with rigorous uncertainty quantification, such as reliable labeling, drug discovery, and the alignment of large language models. Nevertheless, existing methods assume clean responses on calibration data, an assumption that rarely holds in practice. In this paper, we formulate the above tasks as selecting candidates with true predicted labels or with responses exceeding certain values. We demonstrate that existing conformal selection methods fail to control the false discovery rate (FDR) or suffer from severe power loss under contaminated calibration data. To that end, we propose Robust Conformalized Selection (RCS), a unified framework for selective classification with valid FDR control under general label contamination. The key insight of RCS lies in a novel statistical reduction: by separately conditioning on different classes, we translate the intractable label noise into a localized covariate shift problem, which then enables a covariate-adjusted empirical-Bayes-type estimate of the number of false selections. Statistical properties such as the asymptotic FDR control, power optimality, and robustness of RCS are established. We further develop an instantiation of RCS under randomized response model, and also apply RCS to the task of selecting candidates with large response values. Extensive experiments on both simulated and real-world datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of RCS.
Machine Learning (stat.ML); Machine Learning (cs.LG); Methodology (stat.ME)
arXiv:2607.22985 [stat.ML]
(or arXiv:2607.22985v1 [stat.ML] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.22985 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 310 words
Related coverage
Latent reasoning architectures would likely undermine CoT, our strongest oversight tool
AI Alignment Forum · Sep 23, 2026
Online Conformal Abstention Under Adversarial Bandit Feedback
arXiv · Oct 6, 2026
Links #3: 2026/06 Part 1
LessWrong · Jun 15, 2026
Recognition, Simulation, and Refusal: A Contamination-Aware Study of Classic Psychological Effects in LLM Agents
arXiv · Sep 22, 2026