aiqbench analysis
This research addresses robust online matching in dynamically growing trees, deriving theoretical bounds on regret when the underlying growth law is misspecified or unknown. By leveraging properties of Bellman continuation scores and geometric policy updates, the study establishes that optimal threshold policies incur at most twice the cumulative model error without additional horizon penalties. The work provides rigorous complexity guarantees for algorithms operating under uncertainty in network expansion scenarios.
Robust and Learned Online Matching in Growing Trees
arXiv:2609.40077v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We study irrevocable maximum-cardinality matching in trees revealed by successive leaf attachments, with a known horizon and an exogenous growth law that is misspecified or unknown. For deterministic affine attachment forecasts with nonnegative degree reinforcement, the optimal threshold policy loses at most twice the cumulative expected conditional total-variation error relative to an online oracle knowing the actual growth law. This follows from a unit-span property of the Bellman continuation score and has no additional horizon factor. A four-vertex example attains the coefficient two for the specified deterministic policy, and a two-model argument gives a lower bound linear in the model-error budget for arbitrary policies under general misspecification. For uniform-preferential attachment, the local error has an exact expression through the leaf count. When its constant mixture parameter is unknown, we estimate it from the same growing tree and update the threshold policy at geometric times. A parameter-sensitivity bound for individual Bellman prices and uniform degree-moment estimates yield expected regret $O(\sqrt{n}\log^2 n)$, using $O(n^2\log n)$ arithmetic operations and $O(n)$ stored entries. The exact minimax rate remains open.
Abstract:We study irrevocable maximum-cardinality matching in trees revealed by successive leaf attachments, with a known horizon and an exogenous growth law that is misspecified or unknown. For deterministic affine attachment forecasts with nonnegative degree reinforcement, the optimal threshold policy loses at most twice the cumulative expected conditional total-variation error relative to an online oracle knowing the actual growth law. This follows from a unit-span property of the Bellman continuation score and has no additional horizon factor. A four-vertex example attains the coefficient two for the specified deterministic policy, and a two-model argument gives a lower bound linear in the model-error budget for arbitrary policies under general misspecification. For uniform-preferential attachment, the local error has an exact expression through the leaf count. When its constant mixture parameter is unknown, we estimate it from the same growing tree and update the threshold policy at geometric times. A parameter-sensitivity bound for individual Bellman prices and uniform degree-moment estimates yield expected regret $O(\sqrt{n}\log^2 n)$, using $O(n^2\log n)$ arithmetic operations and $O(n)$ stored entries. The exact minimax rate remains open.
Data Structures and Algorithms (cs.DS); Machine Learning (cs.LG); Probability (math.PR)
arXiv:2609.40077 [cs.DS]
(or arXiv:2609.40077v1 [cs.DS] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.40077 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 276 words
Related coverage

Import AI 464: Fables writes GPU kernels; AI automation; and analog computation
Import AI · Jul 6, 2026

Presentation: Building Evals for AI Adoption: from Principles to Practice
InfoQ · May 29, 2026

Building trust in AI agents: A production-ready evaluation framework with Amazon Bedrock AgentCore
AWS · Oct 16, 2026

Digital States 2026: AI Moves From Experiment to Infrastructure
govtech.com · Sep 24, 2026