RoboTwin-Phys: Do WAMs and VLAs Understand the Physical World?

arXiv:2609.26292v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Physical-condition diversity is largely missing from current benchmarks for robot manipulation. While large-scale simulation benchmarks increasingly incorporate variations in object appearance, scene layout, and visual observations, they typically keep the underlying physical parameters fixed. As a result, important sources of real-world variability, such as changes in mass, friction, and joint dynamics, remain largely untested. We introduce RoboTwin-Phys, a physics-diverse benchmark that treats physical-condition diversity as an explicit dimension of robot manipulation evaluation. The benchmark continuously varies 13 physical attributes within physically plausible ranges, providing a unified setting for evaluating policies across diverse physical operating conditions. We further release more than 5,000 expert demonstrations with ground-truth physical parameters, enabling physical-attribute estimation, condition-aware modeling, and physics-conditioned policy training. Evaluations of representative WAMs and VLAs reveal a substantial robustness gap: models that remain effective under existing visual and layout randomization can degrade markedly under changes in physical conditions. RoboTwin-Phys provides the benchmark, data, and evaluation protocol needed to systematically measure and improve robustness to physical-condition diversity in robot manipulation.

Title:RoboTwin-Phys: Do WAMs and VLAs Understand the Physical World?

Abstract:Physical-condition diversity is largely missing from current benchmarks for robot manipulation. While large-scale simulation benchmarks increasingly incorporate variations in object appearance, scene layout, and visual observations, they typically keep the underlying physical parameters fixed. As a result, important sources of real-world variability, such as changes in mass, friction, and joint dynamics, remain largely untested. We introduce RoboTwin-Phys, a physics-diverse benchmark that treats physical-condition diversity as an explicit dimension of robot manipulation evaluation. The benchmark continuously varies 13 physical attributes within physically plausible ranges, providing a unified setting for evaluating policies across diverse physical operating conditions. We further release more than 5,000 expert demonstrations with ground-truth physical parameters, enabling physical-attribute estimation, condition-aware modeling, and physics-conditioned policy training. Evaluations of representative WAMs and VLAs reveal a substantial robustness gap: models that remain effective under existing visual and layout randomization can degrade markedly under changes in physical conditions. RoboTwin-Phys provides the benchmark, data, and evaluation protocol needed to systematically measure and improve robustness to physical-condition diversity in robot manipulation.

Robotics (cs.RO)

arXiv:2609.26292 [cs.RO]

(or arXiv:2609.26292v1 [cs.RO] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.26292 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

aiqbench analysis

RoboTwin-Phys: Do WAMs and VLAs Understand the Physical World?

Related coverage