aiqbench analysis
The paper targets a practical bottleneck in embodied-AI research: benchmark evaluation of robot policies is slow and fragmented, with the GPU often sitting idle while CPU-bound simulators run. RoboScope Kit wraps models and benchmarks behind common interfaces and schedules simulator workers and model replicas separately. The reported speedups (4.45x to 25x) are measured on specific benchmarks and hardware, so readers should check whether they hold for their own setups, but the approach matters for anyone running large-scale VLA policy comparisons.
RoboScope Kit: Unified Interfaces for Fast and Scalable Embodied-AI Evaluation
arXiv:2611.03850v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Simulation benchmarks are the standard way to compare robot policies, but each benchmark brings its own evaluator, observation layout, and action convention, and evaluation is slow: 500 RoboTwin Easy episodes with one simulator and one model on one GPU take 359.7 minutes. Profiling the official StarVLA evaluator shows that simulation occupies CPU cores while the GPU averages 14.3% utilization. RoboScope Kit wraps each model once in a Python class called a Policy, and each benchmark once in an adapter around the benchmark's own evaluator, so the benchmark's rules and scoring stay unchanged. Scheduling runs simulator workers and Policy replicas as separate pools, sizes both from measured probes, and shards work deterministically across GPU instances; runtime optimization renders only the observations an action-chunk Policy reads. Adapters cover six benchmark families. On LIBERO-Long with a StarVLA checkpoint on one 48 GiB RTX 4090, the concurrency search selects twelve simulator workers sharing three Policy replicas, which evaluate 500 episodes 4.45$\times$ faster than the official StarVLA evaluation with equivalent success rates, 2.78$\times$ faster than RLinf, and 1.52$\times$ faster than vla-eval at its tuned configuration. With CUDA MPS, which lets the replicas run their kernels concurrently, the search selects sixteen workers sharing four replicas, 6.16$\times$ faster than StarVLA, 3.85$\times$ faster than RLinf, and 2.10$\times$ faster than vla-eval. On RoboTwin Easy, four GPUs with chunk-boundary observation complete the 500 episodes in 14.4 minutes, 25.04$\times$ faster than the single-GPU baseline, with identical success outcomes and terminal steps.
Abstract:Simulation benchmarks are the standard way to compare robot policies, but each benchmark brings its own evaluator, observation layout, and action convention, and evaluation is slow: 500 RoboTwin Easy episodes with one simulator and one model on one GPU take 359.7 minutes. Profiling the official StarVLA evaluator shows that simulation occupies CPU cores while the GPU averages 14.3% utilization. RoboScope Kit wraps each model once in a Python class called a Policy, and each benchmark once in an adapter around the benchmark's own evaluator, so the benchmark's rules and scoring stay unchanged. Scheduling runs simulator workers and Policy replicas as separate pools, sizes both from measured probes, and shards work deterministically across GPU instances; runtime optimization renders only the observations an action-chunk Policy reads. Adapters cover six benchmark families. On LIBERO-Long with a StarVLA checkpoint on one 48 GiB RTX 4090, the concurrency search selects twelve simulator workers sharing three Policy replicas, which evaluate 500 episodes 4.45$\times$ faster than the official StarVLA evaluation with equivalent success rates, 2.78$\times$ faster than RLinf, and 1.52$\times$ faster than vla-eval at its tuned configuration. With CUDA MPS, which lets the replicas run their kernels concurrently, the search selects sixteen workers sharing four replicas, 6.16$\times$ faster than StarVLA, 3.85$\times$ faster than RLinf, and 2.10$\times$ faster than vla-eval. On RoboTwin Easy, four GPUs with chunk-boundary observation complete the 500 episodes in 14.4 minutes, 25.04$\times$ faster than the single-GPU baseline, with identical success outcomes and terminal steps.
29 pages, 9 figures. Project page: this https URL Code: this https URL
Robotics (cs.RO); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2611.03850 [cs.RO]
(or arXiv:2611.03850v1 [cs.RO] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2611.03850 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 349 words